Can Expropriation Without Compensation Lawsuits Be Filed in Wind Energy Projects?

Introduction

Wind energy projects are often established on vast rural or coastal lands due to their high wind potential. While these projects contribute to sustainable energy production and economic growth, they frequently intersect with complex land rights and expropriation issues. One of the legal debates arising in this context is whether expropriation without compensation (or de facto expropriation) claims can be filed by landowners when wind energy project installations or infrastructure (such as access roads and transmission lines) interfere with property rights without formal expropriation.

In Turkish law, the principle of “protection of property rights” is enshrined in Article 35 of the Constitution of the Republic of Turkey. Any restriction or acquisition of property for public use requires lawful expropriation procedures and compensation, as stipulated under the Expropriation Law No. 2942. However, in renewable energy projects, especially wind farms, the legal boundaries between private sector investments and public utility functions sometimes blur, raising disputes about compensation rights and unlawful occupation of land.

This article explores whether landowners affected by wind energy projects can initiate lawsuits for expropriation without compensation. It analyzes both theoretical legal concepts and practical case studies, while also providing guidance for investors and landowners.

---

1. Legal Concept of Expropriation Without Compensation

1.1. Definition and Basis

Expropriation without compensation (also called “de facto expropriation” or kamulaştırmasız el atma) refers to situations where a public authority—or a private company carrying out a public utility project—takes possession of or restricts the use of private land without following formal expropriation procedures and without paying compensation to the owner.

The Turkish Court of Cassation (Yargıtay) and the Constitutional Court have consistently held that any de facto occupation by entities providing public services, even private energy companies, may be considered unlawful interference with property rights, thus giving rise to claims for compensation or restoration.

1.2. Relevant Legislation

• Expropriation Law No. 2942 (especially Articles 27 and 30, covering urgent expropriation and transfer of ownership),
• Turkish Civil Code (TCC) Articles 683-684 (property rights and trespass),
• Energy Market Law No. 6446 (granting energy companies certain rights for infrastructure, with obligations for compensation),
• Constitution Article 46 (expropriation principle requiring prior and fair compensation).

---

2. Expropriation in Wind Energy Projects

Wind energy projects often require not only the land where turbines are installed but also ancillary infrastructure, such as:

• Access roads for maintenance,
• Underground or overhead transmission lines,
• Substations and grid connection points,
• Land used for construction or logistics during the project phase.

Energy companies must obtain legal rights to use these lands—either through voluntary agreements with landowners (e.g., leasing, easements) or through formal expropriation procedures (typically initiated by the Ministry of Energy or the state, then transferred to the investor).

Failure to obtain proper permits or compensation arrangements could result in landowners filing lawsuits for unlawful occupation.

---

3. Conditions for Filing Expropriation Without Compensation Lawsuits

A landowner may file a lawsuit for de facto expropriation if:

1. There is actual occupation or restriction: The land is used or occupied by a wind energy company or related infrastructure without a legal title (lease, easement, or expropriation decision).
2. The occupation is related to a public utility: Courts recognize energy generation and transmission as public services. Thus, even private companies may face claims if they fail to compensate landowners.
3. No prior agreement or compensation: If no voluntary contract has been signed, or if payment is insufficient.

3.1. Legal Remedies for Landowners

• Compensation Lawsuit (Tazminat Davası): Landowners can demand the fair market value of the land occupied.
• Restitution Claim (El Atmanın Önlenmesi): If the occupation is illegal and not justified by public service, owners can demand the cessation of occupation.
• Annulment Actions: If an expropriation decision is made but without proper procedure, administrative courts may be involved.

---

4. Practical Challenges in Wind Energy Projects

From both the investor and landowner perspectives, several practical issues arise:

4.1. For Investors (Wind Energy Companies):

• Failure to secure easement rights or purchase agreements leads to legal disputes.
• Delays in obtaining permits from the Ministry of Energy or local municipalities increase the risk of claims.
• Compensation costs can escalate if courts calculate land values with updated market prices.

4.2. For Landowners:

• Lack of awareness of their rights may result in undervalued compensation agreements.
• Disputes often require technical appraisals and expert reports, which can prolong litigation.

---

5. Practical and Legal Recommendations

5.1. For Investors:

1. Conduct Detailed Land Due Diligence: Before initiating construction, ensure all land rights (easements, leases, or purchases) are legally secured.
2. Use Notarized Easement Contracts: Proper legal documentation reduces the risk of lawsuits.
3. Engage with Local Communities: Early negotiations with landowners prevent future disputes.

5.2. For Landowners:

1. Verify All Permissions: Check whether the company has valid expropriation authority.
2. Consult Legal Experts: Evaluate potential claims for compensation or trespass.
3. Request Market Value Assessments: Seek professional valuation reports during negotiations.

---

6. International and Comparative Perspective

In other jurisdictions, such as the EU or the US, wind energy projects are typically subject to strict land use agreements and mandatory compensation schemes. Turkey’s approach is evolving, but European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) rulings have repeatedly emphasized that uncompensated land occupation constitutes a violation of the right to property under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 of the ECHR.

Turkish courts often reference these international standards when evaluating claims related to energy projects.

---

7. Conclusion

To answer the core question: Yes, expropriation without compensation lawsuits can be filed in wind energy projects if landowners’ rights are violated without proper legal procedures or fair compensation. While wind energy projects serve public interest and support Turkey’s renewable energy goals, they cannot override constitutional property rights. For investors, meticulous legal planning and transparent negotiations with landowners are essential. For landowners, understanding the nuances of compensation claims ensures that their rights are protected. Ultimately, the balance between sustainable energy development and property rights must be maintained through robust legal frameworks and proactive risk management.