Bad Faith Trademark Registration in Turkey: Legal Remedies and Practical Fixes

Introduction

Bad Faith Trademark Registration in Turkey typically appears where a local actor files an identical or confusingly similar mark to a foreign brand—without consent—and then tries to extract leverage as a purported “rights holder.” These filings disrupt market entry, advertising, marketplace listings, and even customs clearances.

Brief note on scope: Trademark rights protect the sign as a source identifier; they do not, by themselves, encompass sales or distribution rights. Sales rights are contractual (licence/distribution agreements). Holding a registration is not a substitute for being an authorized seller.


What counts as bad faith?

Under the Industrial Property Code (SMK), bad faith is both (i) a relative ground for refusal at the opposition stage and (ii) a ground for invalidation after registration. Tribunals and courts infer bad faith from context, including:

  • Prior knowledge of the foreign brand (trade-fair contacts, emails, prior distributorship/agency);
  • Filing to block the brand owner or to demand payment for an assignment later;
  • Targeting well-known marks (Paris Convention logic) despite clear reputation;
  • Marketing that misleads the public as “exclusive/official” without a licence.

Bad faith is an evidentiary question: timing, correspondence, domain registrations, ad buys, marketplace behavior, and public claims of exclusivity all matter.


Immediate remedies (two-track strategy)

1) Administrative opposition (publication window)

If the application is still published for opposition, file a reasoned opposition asserting:

  • earlier rights (Turkish and foreign registrations/applications),
  • well-known mark status (sales, media, surveys), and
  • bad faith (documented knowledge, prior dealings, screenshots).

A strong record can stop the mark before it matures, saving time and cost.

2) Judicial invalidation (post-registration)

Where a certificate has already issued, bring a civil invalidation action before the specialized IP court, invoking:

  • bad faith;
  • likelihood of confusion/dilution and, where relevant, reputation claims;
  • unfair competition (misleading public, free-riding);
  • later, non-use after the grace period, if applicable.

Request a preliminary injunction (ihtiyati tedbir) to halt use, domain redirects, marketplace ads, and paid keywords during the case. Courts may require a bond; narrowly tailored measures and robust proof increase success.


Ancillary enforcement channels

  • Marketplaces & ads: Use platform brand-registry tools; challenge keyword ads that exploit the mark; request takedowns for counterfeit or confusing listings.
  • Domain names: For “.tr”, pursue TRABİS proceedings; for gTLDs (e.g., .com), file UDRP with WIPO or another provider—seeking cancellation or transfer.
  • Customs: Record the mark to enable border detentions against counterfeit or misleadingly branded goods.
  • Hosting/search intermediaries: Send notice-and-takedown letters referencing the court/office action.

Typical defenses—and how to rebut them

  • “First-to-file in Türkiye protects me.” First-to-file is not absolute; bad faith defeats formal priority. Show knowledge, reputation, and blocking behavior.
  • “I’m the exclusive seller.” Ask for the licence/distribution agreement. If none exists (or it expired), the claim collapses. Remember: registration ≠ sales authorization.
  • “Descriptive/fair use only.” Demonstrate that the sign is used as a badge of origin (logo placement, product pages, store banners), not as a purely descriptive term.
  • “Independent brand creation.” Use timing, communications, domain history, and ad spend patterns to show the filing targeted the foreign brand’s goodwill.

Lawful market entry (if you want to sell the brand)

If the commercial goal is legitimate distribution, the path is contractual and compliant:

  1. Sign a licence or distribution agreement with the brand owner (territory, term, QC rules, IP use guidelines, KPI/termination).
  2. Record the licence with TürkPatent for opposability to third parties.
  3. Align online assets (domains, social accounts, ads) with the contract; avoid registering the brand as a domain/name without permission.
  4. If a defensive Turkish filing is needed, file in the brand owner’s name (or as licensee with written authority) to avoid bad-faith optics.
  5. Keep marketing truthful: do not claim “official/exclusive” status unless the contract actually grants it.

Evidence that moves the needle

Winning or defeating a Bad Faith Trademark Registration in Turkey depends on disciplined proof:

  • Trademark portfolios (home country + international + Turkish filings),
  • Sales figures, press coverage, and market surveys (reputation),
  • Emails/fair photos showing the respondent knew the brand,
  • Dated screenshots of websites, marketplaces, and keyword ads,
  • WHOIS/domain records and redirects,
  • Consumer confusion logs and reseller statements,
  • Platform takedown correspondence and outcomes.

Practical timeline (playbook)

  1. Audit & preserve evidence (notarized screenshots; delil tespiti if needed).
  2. File opposition (if within publication window) or prepare invalidation.
  3. Seek injunction to stop immediate harm (ads, domains, listings).
  4. Run parallel takedowns on marketplaces/ads and, where relevant, TRABİS/UDRP.
  5. Open settlement channel: some disputes settle via assignment to the true owner with limited compensation; ensure warranties and non-re-filing covenants.
  6. Follow through to final judgment or administrative transfer; record all outcomes (office/court) for future platform enforcement.

Conclusion

Bad Faith Trademark Registration in Turkey is not a gateway to legitimate market control; it is a legally fragile position that courts and TürkPatent routinely unwind when the facts reveal opportunism. Keep the core distinction clear: trademark rights do not encompass sales rights—sales authority comes from contract, while the trademark protects the brand’s sign and goodwill. For brand owners, the winning formula is a two-track response (administrative opposition + judicial invalidation) supported by injunctions and platform/domain actions. For would-be distributors, the safe route is simple: contract first, recordal second, compliant marketing always.

Categories:

Yanıt yok

Bir yanıt yazın

E-posta adresiniz yayınlanmayacak. Gerekli alanlar * ile işaretlenmişlerdir

Our Client

We provide a wide range of Turkish legal services to businesses and individuals throughout the world. Our services include comprehensive, updated legal information, professional legal consultation and representation

Our Team

.Our team includes business and trial lawyers experienced in a wide range of legal services across a broad spectrum of industries.

Why Choose Us

We will hold your hand. We will make every effort to ensure that you understand and are comfortable with each step of the legal process.

Open chat
1
Hello Can İ Help you?
Hello
Can i help you?
Call Now Button