Introduction
Commercial Agency and Commission Agreements play a central role in business law, particularly under the Turkish Commercial Code (TTK). These agreements govern the relationship between the principal and the agent, shaping the rights and obligations of both parties. Unlike distribution agreements, which involve independent reselling, agency contracts focus on representation and commission-based activity. Understanding the legal framework and its practice is vital for drafting enforceable agreements and for resolving disputes concerning representation authority, termination with just cause, and compensation rights.
Legal Framework of Agency under the Turkish Commercial Code (TTK)
The TTK (Articles 102–123) provides the primary framework for commercial agency agreements. According to the law:
- An agent (acente) is a person or entity permanently authorized to negotiate or conclude commercial transactions on behalf of a principal within a certain territory.
- A commission agent (komisyoncu), by contrast, acts in its own name but on account of the principal, typically earning remuneration through commission.
Both forms are widely recognized in international practice, but Turkish law contains specific rules that protect agents and balance the commercial relationship.
Representation Authority (Temsil Yetkisi)
The core feature of agency is representation authority. Under TTK:
- The agent may have authority to conclude contracts on behalf of the principal, or only to negotiate without finalizing agreements.
- Authority may be general (covering all business in the defined territory) or limited (restricted to specific transactions or clients).
- To protect third parties, the principal must publicly declare limitations on authority, usually through commercial registry or direct notification.
In practice, disputes often arise where the agent exceeds authority, raising issues of liability for both principal and third parties. Courts usually adopt a protective stance toward third parties acting in good faith, while holding the agent liable internally for breaches.
Termination with Just Cause (Haklı Sebep ile Fesih)
One of the most significant legal issues in Commercial Agency Agreements is termination.
- The contract may be concluded for a fixed term or indefinitely.
- Either party may terminate with just cause (haklı sebep) if circumstances make continuation unreasonable (e.g., breach of duty, insolvency, loss of trust).
- Absent just cause, termination must comply with statutory notice periods to avoid liability.
The concept of haklı sebep has been interpreted broadly by Turkish courts, including serious breaches of contractual obligations, misconduct, or failure to meet agreed sales targets.
Compensation Rights (Tazminat Hakkı)
Upon termination, compensation claims are often the most contentious issue. Under TTK and Yargıtay (Supreme Court of Turkey) case law:
- Goodwill Compensation (Müşteri Tazminatı):
- Agents who have created or expanded a customer base may claim compensation if the principal continues to benefit from those customers after termination.
- The rationale is to prevent unjust enrichment of the principal at the expense of the agent’s efforts.
- Damages for Abrupt Termination:
- If an indefinite-term contract is terminated without observing notice requirements, the agent may claim damages.
- Equitable Compensation:
- Courts may grant additional compensation based on principles of good faith and fairness, especially where the agent has made substantial investments.
This protective framework aligns Turkish law with European Union Directive 86/653/EEC on commercial agents, ensuring consistency with international standards.
Practical Issues in Drafting Agency Agreements
When drafting Commercial Agency and Commission Agreements, practitioners should address:
- Scope of Representation: Define clearly whether the agent may conclude contracts, negotiate only, or act as commission agent.
- Territorial Limitations: Specify regions, markets, or customer groups.
- Remuneration Structure: Fixed commission rate, success-based commission, or hybrid models.
- Termination Clauses: Include just cause examples and compliance with statutory notice periods.
- Post-Termination Compensation: Anticipate goodwill and investment-related claims.
- Non-Compete Obligations: Limit agent’s post-contract activities within reasonable scope and duration.
- Dispute Resolution: Arbitration or jurisdiction clauses for cross-border practice.
Comparative Perspective
- Civil Law Jurisdictions (Germany, France, Turkey): Strong statutory protections, especially for termination and goodwill compensation.
- Common Law Jurisdictions (UK, US): Greater reliance on freedom of contract, though EU directives still apply in the UK.
- International Practice: Many multinational contracts adopt hybrid models, combining commission and agency principles.
Risks and Benefits
- Benefits for Principals: Flexible market entry, lower fixed costs, access to established networks.
- Benefits for Agents: Stable income through commissions, legal protection for termination and compensation.
- Risks: Disputes over authority scope, dependency on principal, liability for exceeding authority, and litigation over termination rights.
Conclusion
In today’s business environment, Commercial Agency and Commission Agreements remain indispensable tools for market expansion and representation. The legal framework and its practice, particularly under the TTK, emphasize representation authority, termination with just cause, and compensation rights. For both principals and agents, careful drafting of agency agreements ensures legal certainty and minimizes disputes.
Properly structured Commercial Agency and Commission Agreements thus provide a fair balance between commercial flexibility and statutory protection, reflecting both domestic Turkish law and international practice.
Yanıt yok