When a debtor cannot pay on time in Turkey, the best outcome for both sides is often not immediate enforcement, but a structured debt restructuring agreement. Creditors want recoverability and leverage. Debtors want time without losing the business. The problem is that many “installment agreements” are drafted informally—one-page promises, vague dates, no security, and no default consequences. Those deals fail, and enforcement becomes even harder than before.
This SEO-focused 1500-word article explains debt restructuring agreements in Turkey: how to structure an installment plan, which security package works best, how to draft default clauses that actually create leverage, and how to avoid the most common traps.
1) What Is a Debt Restructuring Agreement in Turkey?
A debt restructuring agreement is a written settlement where the creditor and debtor modify repayment terms—typically by:
- extending maturity,
- splitting payments into installments,
- reducing or deferring interest/penalties,
- creating security and monitoring mechanisms.
In Turkey, restructuring agreements are commonly used for:
- unpaid invoices and supplier debt,
- lease arrears,
- shareholder disputes (buyouts paid in installments),
- commercial loan workouts (non-bank or private),
- multi-creditor pressure situations where business survival is still possible.
Key point: A restructuring agreement is not “soft.” If drafted correctly, it is often the strongest collection tool because it converts a disputed, messy claim into a clear repayment roadmap with security.
2) When Restructuring Is Better Than Immediate Enforcement
Restructuring is often smarter than enforcement when:
- the debtor has a viable business but temporary liquidity gap,
- enforcement would kill operations and reduce recovery,
- creditor wants predictable cashflows rather than long litigation,
- both sides want to avoid reputational damage and business disruption.
However, restructuring is dangerous when:
- debtor has no real cashflow recovery path,
- there is evidence of asset stripping or bad faith,
- security is impossible and the debtor is already collapsing.
Rule: Restructure only if you can combine “time” with “control and security.”
3) The Core of Every Restructuring: A Realistic Installment Plan
The installment plan must be mechanical, not emotional. It should clearly state:
- total debt amount (principal + agreed interest/penalties),
- installment dates and exact amounts,
- currency and FX conversion method (if applicable),
- payment method and bank account,
- whether partial payments are allowed and how they are allocated (principal first vs interest first),
- whether early repayment is allowed (and whether it gives discounts).
Best practice: Build the plan from the debtor’s cashflow, not from the creditor’s wish. If the plan is unrealistic, default is guaranteed—and you lose time.
4) Debt Acknowledgment: Turn Dispute Into Certainty
In many Turkish disputes, the debtor tries to delay by objecting: “I don’t owe that amount.” A good restructuring agreement includes a clear acknowledgment that:
- the debt exists,
- the amount is agreed,
- invoices/contracts underlying the debt are listed (schedule),
- the debtor waives certain dispute defenses to the extent legally and commercially acceptable.
This is how you convert a “document-weak” claim into a “document-strong” enforcement position.
5) Security Package: What Creditors Should Ask For
A restructuring agreement is only as good as its security. Common security tools in Turkey include:
A) Pledge (Rehin)
- pledge over movables (equipment, inventory),
- pledge over receivables,
- share pledge (common in buyouts and M&A installment deals).
Best for: creating priority and real collateral.
B) Mortgage (İpotek)
- mortgage over real estate.
Best for: large debts and strong security needs.
C) Corporate Guarantee
- parent company or group entity guarantees.
Best for: group structures where debtor company is thin.
D) Personal Guarantee
- founder/shareholder guarantees.
Best for: behavior leverage when company assets are weak.
E) Escrow / Retention / Cheque-Style Security (Commercial Use)
Depending on deal structure, creditors may seek practical instruments and escrow logic.
Best practice: Don’t rely on only one security tool if debt size is meaningful. Use layered security: mortgage + pledge + guarantee where commercially feasible.
6) Monitoring and Reporting: Prevent “Value Leakage” During Installments
A major restructuring risk is that while the creditor waits, the debtor empties the company through:
- related-party payments,
- excessive salaries/management fees,
- new borrowing secured ahead of the creditor,
- asset sales.
To prevent this, include covenants such as:
- monthly financial reporting,
- bank movement summaries,
- restriction on related-party transactions without consent,
- restriction on new pledges/mortgages,
- limitation on borrowing above a threshold,
- prohibition of asset sales above a threshold without approval.
Practical reality: Monitoring is a security tool. Without monitoring, you learn the debtor is insolvent only after the last installment is missed.
7) The Most Important Part: Default Clauses That Create Leverage
Default clauses are where many agreements fail. A strong agreement defines:
A) Default Trigger
- missed installment (even by 1 day),
- breach of covenants (new liens, asset sale),
- false statements about finances,
- insolvency indicators (bankruptcy, concordat filing).
B) Cure Period (If Any)
Creditors may allow a short cure period, but keep it tight (e.g., X days), and ensure it doesn’t create endless delay.
C) Acceleration (Immediate Due)
If default occurs, the agreement should allow:
- remaining balance becomes immediately due,
- default interest applies from default date,
- creditor may enforce security immediately.
D) Enforcement Path and Costs
Specify:
- where disputes will be resolved,
- debtor pays enforcement and legal costs (commercially common),
- how notices are served and deemed received.
Best practice: Default clauses should not be “threats.” They should be an executable map that the creditor can trigger without ambiguity.
8) Multi-Creditor Situations: Avoid Being the Last in Line
If multiple creditors exist, restructuring with one creditor can be undermined by:
- other creditors enforcing,
- new liens being granted,
- the debtor prioritizing other payments.
If you suspect multi-creditor pressure, consider:
- intercreditor coordination where possible,
- requiring negative pledge covenants,
- requiring disclosure of other debts and enforcement threats,
- securing first-degree collateral where realistic.
9) Common Mistakes That Kill Restructuring Deals
- unrealistic installment plan that debtor cannot pay
- no collateral / no security
- no monitoring rights
- vague default definition
- weak evidence schedule (no invoice list / no acknowledgment)
- no release mechanism (or release too early)
- signing authority not verified (corporate guarantee signed improperly)
A good restructuring agreement is a controlled system, not a promise.
10) A Practical Checklist for a “Strong” Restructuring Agreement
Before signing, ensure you have:
- debt amount + invoice/contract schedule
- installment timetable with exact dates and amounts
- debt acknowledgment and limited defenses
- security package (pledge/mortgage/guarantee)
- monitoring and negative covenants
- default triggers + acceleration rules
- notice and evidence rules
- clear release mechanism after full payment
If you have these, the agreement usually works in practice.
FAQ
Is restructuring legally safer than enforcement in Turkey?
It can be, if it includes acknowledgment, clear payment schedule, and enforceable security. Otherwise, it becomes a delay that harms creditors.
What is the most important clause in an installment agreement?
Default + acceleration clauses are the strongest leverage tools—if drafted clearly.
Should creditors accept “no security” restructuring?
Only for small amounts or when debtor has very strong credibility. For meaningful sums, no-security restructuring is high risk.
Yanıt yok