Introduction
Arbitration in Turkey has become an increasingly preferred dispute resolution mechanism, particularly in commercial and international transactions. As foreign investment, cross-border trade, and infrastructure projects expand, parties often choose arbitration clauses instead of submitting disputes to Turkish state courts.
But is arbitration in Turkey truly better than court litigation?
The answer depends on the nature of the dispute, enforcement goals, cost considerations, confidentiality needs, and time sensitivity. While arbitration offers flexibility and international enforceability, it may also involve higher upfront costs and limited appeal mechanisms.
This article provides a comprehensive overview of arbitration in Turkey, including its legal basis, types of arbitration, enforcement rules, comparison with court litigation, and strategic considerations for foreign parties.
1. Legal Framework of Arbitration in Turkey
Arbitration in Turkey is regulated by two primary laws:
1️⃣ Turkish Code of Civil Procedure (Domestic Arbitration)
Applies when:
- Dispute is domestic
- No foreign element exists
2️⃣ International Arbitration Law (Law No. 4686)
Applies when:
- There is a foreign element
- Parties agree to international arbitration
Turkey is also a party to:
- The 1958 New York Convention on Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards
This makes arbitral awards enforceable in over 160 countries.
2. Types of Arbitration in Turkey
A. Ad Hoc Arbitration
- No institutional supervision
- Parties determine procedural rules
- Flexible but requires careful drafting
B. Institutional Arbitration
Common institutions include:
- Istanbul Arbitration Centre (ISTAC)
- ICC Arbitration (frequently used in Turkey-related contracts)
Institutional arbitration provides procedural structure and administrative support.
3. Valid Arbitration Agreement
An arbitration agreement must:
- Be in writing
- Clearly express parties’ intent to arbitrate
- Define scope of disputes
Invalid or poorly drafted clauses may lead to jurisdiction disputes.
Courts generally respect arbitration agreements unless:
- Subject matter is non-arbitrable
- Clause violates public policy
4. Arbitrability Under Turkish Law
Not all disputes can be resolved by arbitration.
Generally arbitrable:
- Commercial disputes
- Construction contracts
- Shareholder disputes
- International trade contracts
Not arbitrable:
- Criminal matters
- Family law
- Administrative law disputes
- Certain real estate registration issues
Public order matters remain within state courts’ authority.
5. Arbitration Procedure
The arbitration process typically includes:
1️⃣ Appointment of arbitrator(s)
2️⃣ Submission of statements of claim and defense
3️⃣ Evidentiary hearings
4️⃣ Expert reports
5️⃣ Final award issuance
Unlike court litigation:
- Procedure is flexible
- Parties may determine rules
- Hearings may be conducted in English
This is particularly attractive to foreign investors.
6. Duration of Arbitration
Arbitration in Turkey is generally faster than court litigation.
Typical duration:
- 6–18 months
Compared to:
- 2–4 years in multi-level court litigation
Speed is one of arbitration’s strongest advantages.
7. Confidentiality
Court proceedings in Turkey are generally public.
Arbitration offers:
- Confidential hearings
- Private awards
- Protection of commercial secrets
For high-value commercial disputes, confidentiality is often decisive.
8. Costs of Arbitration
Arbitration may involve:
- Arbitrator fees
- Institutional fees
- Legal fees
- Expert fees
While arbitration can be faster, it may be more expensive than court litigation, particularly in high-value disputes.
However, shorter duration may offset long-term litigation costs.
9. Enforcement of Arbitral Awards
One of the greatest strengths of arbitration in Turkey is enforceability.
Domestic arbitral awards:
- Enforced like court judgments after court approval.
Foreign arbitral awards:
- Enforced under the New York Convention.
- Recognition and enforcement procedure required.
Turkish courts generally adopt a pro-enforcement approach.
10. Annulment of Arbitral Awards
Arbitral awards cannot be appealed on merits.
They may only be annulled for limited grounds such as:
- Invalid arbitration agreement
- Lack of due process
- Excess of authority
- Public policy violation
This ensures finality but limits review.
11. Comparison: Arbitration vs Court Litigation
| Criteria | Arbitration | Court Litigation |
|---|---|---|
| Speed | Faster | Slower |
| Confidentiality | Yes | No |
| Appeal | Limited | Multi-level appeal |
| Cost | Higher upfront | Lower upfront |
| International Enforceability | Strong | Requires recognition |
| Procedural Flexibility | High | Limited |
The better option depends on strategic priorities.
12. Arbitration for Foreign Investors
Foreign investors prefer arbitration in Turkey because:
- Proceedings can be conducted in English.
- Arbitrators may have international expertise.
- Awards are enforceable globally.
- Neutral forum can be selected.
In cross-border contracts, arbitration clause is standard practice.
13. Strategic Considerations
Arbitration may be preferable when:
- Dispute involves large financial value.
- Confidentiality is critical.
- Enforcement abroad is expected.
- Technical expertise is needed.
Court litigation may be preferable when:
- Cost sensitivity is high.
- Interim measures are urgent.
- Strong appellate review is desired.
14. Istanbul Arbitration Centre (ISTAC)
Established to promote Turkey as arbitration hub.
Advantages:
- Competitive fees
- Expedited procedures
- English-language proceedings
- Modern rules
ISTAC is increasingly used in regional commercial disputes.
15. Risks and Challenges
Potential risks include:
- Poorly drafted arbitration clauses
- Arbitrator bias allegations
- High expert costs
- Enforcement resistance in rare public policy cases
Careful clause drafting is essential.
Conclusion
Arbitration in Turkey offers speed, confidentiality, flexibility, and strong international enforceability—making it highly attractive for foreign investors and commercial actors.
However, it is not automatically “better” than court litigation. The decision must be based on dispute nature, cost sensitivity, enforcement strategy, and contractual framework.
For international commercial transactions, arbitration in Turkey often provides a balanced, efficient, and enforceable dispute resolution mechanism—especially when supported by proper legal drafting and strategic planning.
Yanıt yok