Securing insurance payments after a maritime casualty (such as a collision, grounding, or fire) on the high seas is not an automatic administrative process; it is a rigorous legal battle. For a shipowner to successfully recover their losses, the preparation of the compensation claim must be executed with technical precision and backed by undeniable legal evidence. This guide outlines the strategic steps involved in managing a compensation claim from the moment of the accident to the final court judgment.
1. Initiating the Compensation Claim: Immediate Obligations
The success of a compensation claim is often determined in the first few hours following an incident.
- Notice of Loss: The insured is legally bound to notify the underwriters (H&M or P&I) immediately. Any unjustifiable delay in notification can be used by insurers as a ground for rejecting the compensation claim or applying a deduction for prejudice.
- Preservation of Evidence: The “Burden of Proof” lies with the claimant. For a compensation claim to stand, the owner must secure the Voyage Data Recorder (VDR) data, engine room logs, and deck logbooks. These documents serve as the primary evidence regarding the cause of the accident.
2. The Role of the Court: Judicial Determination of Evidence
In many jurisdictions, especially in Turkey (Maritime Specialized Courts), a formal compensation claim requires a court-appointed expert’s intervention shortly after the vessel reaches a port.
- Preliminary Discovery of Evidence (İhtiyati Delil Tespiti): Before the vessel is repaired or the evidence is altered, the shipowner should apply to the court for a “Discovery of Evidence.” The report prepared by court-appointed experts is often considered the most “impartial” and “authoritative” document during the subsequent compensation claim litigation.
- Master’s Protest (Sea Protest): Within 24 hours of arrival at the first port, the Master must file a Sea Protest before a court, notary, or consul. This document is a foundational element of the formal compensation claim, declaring that the loss was due to maritime perils rather than negligence.
3. Structural Components of a Professional Compensation Claim
A well-prepared compensation claim file is a comprehensive dossier that must address three core pillars:
- Proximate Cause: Proving that the loss was directly caused by a peril covered under the policy (e.g., “perils of the seas”).
- Quantum of Loss: Documenting the exact financial value of the damage through repair invoices, salvage costs, and independent surveyor reports.
- Warranties and Compliance: Proving that the vessel was in a “seaworthy” condition at the commencement of the voyage and that no “warranty” (e.g., trading limits) was breached.
4. Litigation and Arbitration: When the Claim is Disputed
If the insurer denies the compensation claim or offers an insufficient settlement, the matter moves to the litigation or arbitration phase.
- Jurisdiction and Forum: Most marine policies include a “Choice of Law and Jurisdiction” clause (e.g., London Arbitration or Istanbul Maritime Courts). Filing a compensation claim in the wrong forum can lead to jurisdictional dismissal and wasted time.
- Statute of Limitations: Under the Turkish Commercial Code and most international regimes, compensation claims arising from marine insurance generally expire within 2 years from the date of the casualty. Missing this deadline results in the absolute forfeiture of all rights.
5. Common Defenses Against a Compensation Claim
During litigation, insurers often deploy specific legal defenses to avoid paying the compensation claim:
- Privity of the Assured: Insurers may argue that the loss was caused by a defect (e.g., faulty equipment or understaffing) that the shipowner was personally aware of before the voyage.
- Deviation: If the ship deviated from its planned route without a reasonable cause (like saving a life), the insurer may claim the compensation claim is void as the risk was materially changed.
6. Subrogation: The Transfer of Rights
Once the insurer settles the compensation claim, the legal principle of “Subrogation” takes effect. The insurer “steps into the shoes” of the shipowner and acquires the right to sue any third party (such as a colliding vessel) to recover the paid amount. The shipowner is legally obligated to cooperate and provide all necessary evidence for this subrogated compensation claim.
Conclusion
A compensation claim in maritime insurance is more than a simple request for payment; it is a strategic legal operation. From the initial “Sea Protest” to the final judicial discovery of evidence, every step must be documented to withstand the scrutiny of insurers and courts. Working with a specialized maritime law attorney is the only way to ensure that your compensation claim reaches a successful resolution in the complex world of maritime risk.
Yanıt yok