A detailed legal guide to occupational health and safety obligations in HR management in Turkey, covering employer duties, risk assessment, OHS professionals, worker training, health surveillance, committees, subcontractor coordination, and administrative sanctions.
Occupational health and safety is often treated as a technical field owned by safety engineers, occupational physicians, or site managers. In legal reality, it is also a core HR function. Recruitment, onboarding, training, personnel records, subcontractor coordination, disciplinary follow-up, return-to-work planning, and workforce representation all affect whether an employer can actually comply with Turkish occupational health and safety law. For that reason, occupational health and safety obligations in HR management should be understood as part of workforce governance, not as a separate compliance silo. In Turkey, the main legal framework is built on Occupational Health and Safety Law No. 6331, supported by the Labour Act No. 4857, secondary regulations, and current Ministry guidance and enforcement practice.
The scope of the Turkish OHS regime is broad. Law No. 6331 applies to all work and workplaces in both the public and private sectors, their employers and employer representatives, and all workers, including apprentices and interns, regardless of sector, subject only to limited exceptions such as certain military and emergency interventions, domestic services, and self-employed persons without workers. That breadth matters for HR because it means OHS is not only an industrial or construction issue. Office employers, service businesses, schools, hospitals, logistics companies, and white-collar organizations all fall within the statutory structure.
The law’s central principle is simple but demanding: the employer must ensure workers’ health and safety in every aspect related to work. Article 4 requires the employer to take preventive measures, provide information and training, organize the necessary structure and means, monitor compliance, carry out risk assessment, consider the worker’s capabilities when assigning tasks, and limit access to areas of serious and specific danger. The same article also makes clear that using external competent services does not discharge the employer from responsibility. In HR terms, outsourcing safety expertise does not outsource liability.
That is why HR sits at the center of OHS compliance. Hiring the wrong person into the wrong job, failing to onboard properly, not tracking training, keeping weak personnel files, mishandling health surveillance, or ignoring subcontractor headcount issues can all turn a technically sound safety system into a legally weak one. OHS law in Turkey is not built only on machines, helmets, and site barriers. It is also built on role allocation, documentation, supervision, and employee participation.
1. OHS is an HR issue because prevention starts with workforce design
Article 5 of Law No. 6331 sets out the principles of protection from risks. These include avoiding risks, evaluating unavoidable risks, combating risks at source, adapting work to the individual, adapting to technical progress, replacing dangerous conditions with less dangerous ones, developing a coherent prevention policy, prioritizing collective protection over individual protection, and giving appropriate instructions to workers. That list is often read as a technical safety checklist, but it is just as much an HR governance framework. Adapting work to the individual, for example, directly affects recruitment, placement, role assignment, shift design, accommodation, and return-to-work decisions.
The same law also requires the employer to take the worker’s capabilities into account when entrusting tasks. This is highly relevant to HR management. A compliant employer should not assign an employee to a role simply because the business needs immediate coverage if the employee has not been trained, medically cleared where necessary, or matched appropriately to the risk profile of the work. In practice, some of the most serious OHS failures begin not with a missing guardrail, but with a poor assignment decision.
2. Risk assessment is not optional and HR has to feed it with real workforce data
Article 10 of Law No. 6331 requires the employer to conduct a risk assessment or have one conducted. The law specifically says the assessment must consider the situation of workers who may be affected by risks, the choice of work equipment and substances, workplace organization and housekeeping, and the situation of workers requiring specific policies, including young, older, disabled, pregnant, or breastfeeding workers. The employer must then identify protective measures and ensure that the methods used improve the overall level of protection.
This is one of the clearest links between HR and OHS. A risk assessment cannot be meaningful if the employer does not know who is working, in what role, under what conditions, with what vulnerabilities, and with what training history. HR is usually the function that knows headcount, employment status, subcontractor presence, shift allocation, maternity status where lawfully relevant, disability accommodations, and job changes. If HR does not feed accurate workforce information into the risk assessment process, the employer’s OHS file becomes weaker both in practice and in law.
The Ministry’s guidance reinforces this point. Its FAQ states that under Law No. 6331 employers must carry out risk assessment, prepare emergency plans, arrange evacuation, record and report occupational accidents and diseases, and ensure health surveillance. These are not optional improvements. They are baseline duties the Ministry publicly summarizes as core employer obligations. (Çalışma ve Sosyal Güvenlik Bakanlığı)
3. OHS professionals must be appointed or validly procured
Article 6 of Law No. 6331 requires the employer, in order to provide OHS services, to designate an occupational safety specialist, an occupational physician, and other health staff where required. If competent internal personnel are unavailable, the employer must procure these services from a common health and safety unit. The law also allows the employer to undertake certain services personally if the employer has the required qualifications and documents. In less hazardous workplaces with fewer than 50 employees, the employer or employer representative may fulfill OHS services after completing Ministry-declared training, except for recruitment and periodic medical examinations.
This part of the law has direct HR consequences. Headcount matters. Hazard class matters. Internal qualifications matter. Whether the employer is using internal staff, outside service providers, or self-performed services matters. HR should therefore know not only how many workers are employed, but also how the workplace is classified and which staffing model is being used for safety services. A mistake here can affect both the legality of the OHS setup and the employer’s ability to defend itself after an incident.
The Ministry’s current FAQ adds a timely point: because the latest postponement expired without a further delay, the obligation to appoint OHS professionals now applies to public workplaces as of 31 December 2024 as well. That matters in 2026 because public employers can no longer treat the professional-assignment duty as a future or deferred obligation. (Çalışma ve Sosyal Güvenlik Bakanlığı)
4. Training is mandatory, repeated, and counts as working time
Article 17 of Law No. 6331 requires the employer to ensure that each worker receives adequate health and safety training. The law states that this training must be provided on recruitment, on transfer or change of job, when work equipment changes, and when new technology is introduced. It also says the training must be adapted to new or changed risks and repeated where necessary. Workers’ representatives are entitled to appropriate training as well, and workers cannot be employed in hazardous or very hazardous jobs requiring vocational training if they cannot prove they have received that training.
Equally important for HR and payroll, the law treats OHS training time as actual working time. If the time spent in training exceeds normal weekly working hours, the excess is deemed overtime. That means safety training is not something the employer may simply push outside the workday without legal consequences. Training calendars, attendance records, and payroll treatment should all reflect that rule.
From an HR-management perspective, this makes onboarding one of the highest-risk moments in OHS compliance. A new hire who starts work without documented induction, role-specific safety training, and any required vocational certification creates a double problem: the employer may be unsafe in fact, and unable to prove compliance afterward.
5. Health surveillance is a legal process, not a medical courtesy
Article 15 of Law No. 6331 requires employers to ensure that workers receive health surveillance appropriate to the workplace risks. Health examination is specifically required before assignment, after job change, on return to work following repetitive absence due to occupational accidents, occupational diseases, or health problems upon request, and at periodic intervals depending on the worker, the work, and the hazard class. Workers in hazardous and very hazardous jobs must have a health report before employment. The law also says health-surveillance costs must be borne by the employer and may not impose a financial burden on workers.
This is where HR and occupational health converge very directly. Recruitment, promotion, internal transfer, reassignment after absence, and return-to-work decisions all need to interact with the health-surveillance system. HR should not treat medical clearance as an isolated physician matter. It is part of lawful workforce placement.
The law also protects medical privacy. It states that health data of workers undergoing medical examination must be kept confidential to protect individual privacy and prestige. That means HR may need to know whether the worker is fit for duty or requires restrictions, but not every diagnosis-level detail needs to circulate through management.
6. Worker information, consultation, and participation are mandatory
Article 16 requires the employer to inform workers and their representatives about workplace safety and health risks, preventive and protective measures, their legal rights and responsibilities, and the persons designated for first aid, emergencies, firefighting, and evacuation. The employer must also inform workers promptly where they are or may be exposed to serious and imminent danger.
Article 18 goes further and requires consultation and participation. The employer must consult workers or their representatives on OHS matters, including the introduction of new technology, the choice of equipment, working conditions, and the working environment as they relate to occupational safety and health. This means OHS in Turkey is not a purely top-down model. Worker participation is part of the legal design.
For HR, this is particularly important in restructurings, automation projects, equipment changes, hybrid work models, and organizational redesign. A company may think it is making a purely operational change while Turkish OHS law sees the same change as one that requires consultation because it affects workplace safety and health.
7. Worker representatives and OHS committees need real structure
Law No. 6331 defines a workers’ representative as a worker authorized to participate in OHS activities, monitor them, request measures, and make proposals. Article 20 requires the employer to designate worker representatives if none can be elected or chosen, with the number depending on workforce size, starting from one representative for workplaces with 2 to 50 workers and increasing up to six representatives in very large workplaces. The representatives have the right to request appropriate measures and may not be disadvantaged because of their activities. Where there is an authorized trade union, the union representative acts as the workers’ representative.
Article 22 separately requires an occupational health and safety committee in workplaces where at least 50 employees are employed and permanent work continues for more than six months. The employer must implement committee decisions taken in accordance with OHS legislation. Where there is a main-employer/subcontractor relationship, the law sets out coordination rules on how committees or proxy representatives must interact.
This is a major HR-management point because committee and representation compliance is partly a headcount and organizational-structure issue. HR typically controls the data needed to determine whether thresholds are met, who the worker representatives are, how committee membership is composed, and whether a subcontractor arrangement changes the threshold or coordination picture. The Ministry’s current guidance for public institutions also emphasizes the 50-plus / 6-plus-month threshold and points to the OHS Committee Regulation for membership, meeting rules, and training of committee members.
8. Emergency planning, accident records, and reporting are part of HR compliance
Article 11 requires employers to assess foreseeable emergencies, identify situations that may affect workers and the work environment, and organize emergency planning, firefighting, first aid, and evacuation accordingly. Article 12 adds that where there is serious, imminent, and unavoidable danger, the employer must act immediately, instruct workers to stop work or leave for safety, and not require them to resume work while the serious danger remains.
Article 13 gives workers the right to apply to the committee or, where no committee exists, to the employer, asking for identification of the danger and emergency intervention measures. If the request is upheld, the worker may abstain from work until necessary measures are taken, while preserving pay and contractual rights. In cases of serious, imminent, and unavoidable danger, workers may leave their workstation or danger zone directly.
Article 14 then requires the employer to keep a list of occupational accidents and diseases, prepare reports following the necessary studies, investigate near-miss incidents that could have harmed workers or the workplace, and notify the Social Security Institution within the prescribed deadlines. In HR terms, accident management is not complete when medical attention is arranged. Reporting, internal investigation, and recordkeeping are legal duties.
9. Multiple employers and subcontractors create shared OHS exposure
Turkish labour law already provides that the principal employer is jointly liable with the subcontractor for obligations arising from the Labour Act and the subcontractor’s employment contracts. OHS law adds a separate coordination layer. Article 23 of Law No. 6331 states that where there is more than one employer in the same work environment, those employers must cooperate on occupational hygiene and OHS measures, work together to prevent risks, protect against them, and inform one another and the workers’ representatives about those risks. (Natlex)
For HR, this means subcontracting is never just a procurement issue. Headcount thresholds, committee obligations, emergency coordination, training interfaces, contractor induction, and worker-representative communication all become more complex when several employers share the same workplace. A principal employer that ignores subcontractor workers in its real safety operations may later find that the legal separation looked much cleaner on paper than it did under Turkish law.
10. Current enforcement shows OHS is actively policed
The Ministry’s current enforcement reporting makes clear that OHS compliance is not theoretical. In its programmatic inspection report, the Ministry states that in mineral products manufacturing alone, 1,661 unremedied OHS violations resulted in TRY 57.7 million in administrative fines, and in construction inspections, 4,050 unresolved violations resulted in TRY 106.2 million in fines, with work stoppage decisions at 79 workplaces due to life-threatening issues. The same report also shows that even targeted OHS organization inspections can lead to fines where violations remain uncorrected.
The Ministry also publishes a dedicated page for the 2026 administrative fine schedule under Law No. 6331. At the statutory level, the OHS law structures penalties so that some violations are assessed per obligation, some per worker, some per month until corrected, and some are scaled upward depending on workplace size and hazard class. That design matters because it means an OHS gap can multiply quickly when many employees are affected or when noncompliance continues over time. (Çalışma ve Sosyal Güvenlik Bakanlığı)
11. What HR should actually do
A legally strong HR function in Turkey should treat OHS as a workforce-management system. That means keeping accurate headcount and hazard-class awareness, ensuring recruitment and placement align with fitness-for-work requirements, coordinating risk-assessment inputs, documenting training and vocational-certification status, tracking worker representatives and committee thresholds, and integrating accident-reporting and return-to-work processes into personnel administration.
It also means building practical controls. Job descriptions should reflect risk exposure. Onboarding should include OHS induction and emergency information. Role changes should trigger a review of training and, where necessary, health surveillance. Subcontractor onboarding should be coordinated with OHS records. Medical privacy should be respected in personnel files. And when serious danger arises, HR should support immediate stop-work and worker-protection measures rather than treating them as operational disruption.
The most common HR mistake is to assume that because there is a safety specialist or outside OHS provider, the HR file does not matter. Turkish law points the other way. Safety law and HR law intersect constantly through hiring, training, records, representation, absence, health surveillance, and dismissal. The employer’s OHS defense is only as strong as the organization’s ability to show that these functions actually worked together.
Conclusion
In Turkey, occupational health and safety obligations in HR management are broad, active, and enforceable. Law No. 6331 applies across public and private workplaces, requires the employer to prevent risks, assess hazards, appoint or procure OHS professionals, provide worker training, carry out health surveillance, inform and consult workers, establish representatives and committees where thresholds are met, plan emergencies, record and report accidents, and coordinate across multiple employers sharing the same environment. The Labour Act reinforces this through subcontractor liability and personnel-file duties, while current Ministry enforcement shows that unresolved OHS failures can lead to substantial fines and work stoppages.
For HR teams, the practical conclusion is clear. OHS is not only about protective equipment and inspections. It is about how people are hired, trained, assigned, represented, monitored, documented, and protected throughout the employment relationship. Employers that build OHS into HR management are much better positioned to prevent accidents, defend decisions, and meet their legal obligations before the Ministry or the courts.
Yanıt yok