Introduction
The role of force majeure and hardship clauses in international contracts has never been more critical than in today’s unpredictable global environment. International trade is vulnerable to unforeseen disruptions—ranging from pandemics and wars to supply chain breakdowns and financial crises. These clauses provide contractual mechanisms to address events beyond the parties’ control, ensuring fairness and continuity in cross-border transactions. Instruments such as CISG Article 79 and the UNIDROIT Principles set important standards for how these provisions are interpreted and applied worldwide.
1. Force Majeure Clauses
A force majeure clause excuses a party from liability if extraordinary, unforeseeable events prevent performance.
Key Features
- Unforeseeability: The event could not have been reasonably anticipated.
- Beyond Control: The party is not responsible for the event.
- Causation: The event makes performance impossible, not merely inconvenient.
Examples of Force Majeure Events
- Natural disasters (earthquakes, floods, hurricanes)
- War, terrorism, or political unrest
- Government sanctions or export bans
- Global crises such as pandemics
Drafting Tips
- Always define what constitutes “force majeure.”
- Include procedures for notice and mitigation.
- Clarify whether suspension or termination applies.
2. Hardship Clauses
Unlike force majeure, hardship clauses address situations where performance is still possible but has become excessively burdensome due to unforeseen events.
Distinguishing Features
- Excessive Onus: Performance is not impossible, but disproportionately difficult or costly.
- Duty to Renegotiate: Often requires parties to renegotiate terms in good faith.
- Adaptation by Tribunal: If renegotiation fails, an arbitral tribunal or court may adapt or terminate the contract.
Practical Scenarios
- Sudden devaluation of currency
- Sharp rise in raw material costs
- Unexpected changes in regulatory requirements
3. CISG Article 79
The United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG) deals with impediments under Article 79:
- Excuses a party if failure to perform was due to an impediment beyond their control.
- The impediment must be unforeseeable and unavoidable.
- Temporary impediments suspend obligations, while permanent impediments may terminate them.
- Does not explicitly mention hardship, but arbitral tribunals have sometimes interpreted Article 79 flexibly to cover economic hardship.
4. UNIDROIT Principles
The UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts take a more detailed approach:
- Article 7.1.7 (Force Majeure): Mirrors the CISG in excusing liability for uncontrollable impediments.
- Article 6.2.2–6.2.3 (Hardship): Explicitly recognizes hardship as a ground for renegotiation and possible judicial adaptation.
- Provides a more balanced framework between certainty and fairness.
- Frequently used by arbitral tribunals to interpret or supplement international contracts.
5. Practical Drafting Recommendations
- Combine force majeure and hardship clauses to cover both impossibility and excessive difficulty.
- Refer explicitly to CISG Article 79 or UNIDROIT Principles when adopting these standards.
- Require timely notice and documentation of the impediment.
- Consider multi-tier solutions: renegotiation → mediation → arbitration.
Conclusion
The inclusion of force majeure and hardship clauses in international contracts ensures that parties can navigate crises without destroying their commercial relationships. While CISG Article 79 provides a general standard for impediments, the UNIDROIT Principles go further by explicitly addressing hardship and providing mechanisms for renegotiation. In an era of global uncertainty, well-drafted force majeure and hardship clauses are not just protective measures—they are strategic tools for preserving trust, fairness, and continuity in international trade.
Yanıt yok