Sector-Specific Global Patent Tactics: Tech, Pharma, and Manufacturing
There is no “one-size-fits-all” international patent strategy for commercial companies. What works for a software or AI firm may be ineffective—or even harmful—for a pharmaceutical innovator or an industrial manufacturer. Each sector differs in R&D cycle length, product lifespan, regulatory intensity, imitation patterns, and commercialization models, so global patent tactics must be tailored accordingly.
Below is a structured corporate view of sector-specific global patent playbooks across three major industries.
A) Technology / Software / AI
Tech companies prioritize speed and scalable claim coverage because product cycles are short. They typically combine early priority filings with PCT deferral, then expand through continuation/improvement filings.
Software/AI patentability varies by jurisdiction; some systems are stricter on abstract ideas, while EPO-style regimes may be more receptive when a clear technical effect is shown.
Hence, tech firms localize claim strategies country-by-country, pair patents with trade secrets, and continuously monitor competitors to capture white-space opportunities.
B) Pharmaceuticals / Biotechnology
In pharma and biotech, patents are the financial backbone of R&D, enabling recovery of high clinical development costs.
Companies build patent families around a product’s lifecycle—covering the core compound plus formulations, dosing, delivery systems, new indications, manufacturing methods, and combinations—often described as strategic lifecycle patenting.
Filing timelines are synchronized with regulatory milestones to protect data-visible phases.
Biotech firms also patent platform technologies designed for broad cross-product licensing.
C) Manufacturing / Industrial Companies
Industrial players focus on reverse-engineering defense and supply-chain control. They patent in manufacturing hubs, protect both products and processes, and expand internationally in line with export roll-out. In standard-driven industries (automotive, telecom hardware, energy infrastructure), SEP-style portfolios can create major global licensing leverage.
Yanıt yok