Introduction
Stablecoins have become one of the most important legal topics in crypto asset regulation. Unlike highly volatile cryptocurrencies, stablecoins are designed to maintain a relatively stable value by referencing another asset, most commonly a fiat currency such as the US dollar or euro. In practice, stablecoins are widely used for crypto trading, value storage, cross-border transfers, liquidity management, decentralized finance, exchange settlement, and sometimes attempted payment use.
In Turkey, stablecoins are especially important because crypto adoption is high, inflation and currency volatility have encouraged users to seek digital alternatives, and Turkish users frequently use dollar-referenced stablecoins as a way to preserve value or move liquidity between platforms. However, stablecoins are not free from regulation. They sit at the intersection of crypto asset law, payment law, capital markets regulation, anti-money laundering rules, taxation, data protection, custody law, and consumer protection.
The most important legal distinction under Turkish law is this: stablecoins may be traded or held as crypto assets under the relevant crypto asset framework, but they cannot be freely used as payment instruments. The Central Bank of the Republic of Türkiye’s Regulation on the Disuse of Crypto Assets in Payments defines crypto assets as intangible assets created virtually through distributed ledger or similar technology, not classified as fiat money, deposit money, electronic money, payment instruments, securities, or other capital market instruments, and prohibits their direct or indirect use in payments.
At the same time, the Capital Markets Board of Türkiye, known as the CMB or SPK, has introduced a more structured crypto asset service provider framework through its 2025 communiqués. These rules regulate crypto asset platforms, custody institutions, operating procedures, services, activities, and capital adequacy. MASAK has also increased AML/CFT controls over crypto transfers, including measures affecting stablecoin withdrawals and transfers. Reuters reported in June 2025 that Turkey was preparing waiting periods for crypto withdrawals where Travel Rule information is not applied and stablecoin transfer limits of USD 3,000 daily and USD 50,000 monthly.
This article explains stablecoins under Turkish law, including their legal classification, payment restrictions, CMB crypto regulation, MASAK rules, Travel Rule obligations, custody risks, AML/KYC compliance, taxation, investor protection, cross-border issues, and unresolved legal uncertainty.
1. What Is a Stablecoin?
A stablecoin is a crypto asset designed to maintain a stable value by referencing another asset, right, index, currency, commodity, or basket of assets. The most common stablecoins are pegged to fiat currencies, particularly the US dollar. Examples in global markets include USDT, USDC, DAI, FDUSD, and other dollar-referenced tokens. Some stablecoins are backed by reserves, some are overcollateralized with crypto assets, and some attempt to maintain value through algorithmic mechanisms.
Stablecoins may be grouped into several categories:
Fiat-backed stablecoins, where the issuer claims to hold reserves such as cash, bank deposits, treasury bills, or similar assets.
Crypto-collateralized stablecoins, where the token is backed by other crypto assets.
Commodity-backed stablecoins, where the token is linked to gold, silver, or another commodity.
Algorithmic stablecoins, where price stability is attempted through smart contracts, supply adjustments, or market incentives rather than direct reserve backing.
The legal risk of each model differs. A fully reserved fiat-backed stablecoin raises questions about issuer transparency, reserve custody, redemption rights, and audit reports. A crypto-collateralized stablecoin raises questions about collateral volatility and liquidation. An algorithmic stablecoin raises higher risk because it may lose its peg if the mechanism fails.
Under Turkish law, the term “stablecoin” does not automatically create a separate legal category equal to electronic money, bank deposit, foreign currency, or securities. The legal analysis depends on how the stablecoin is issued, used, traded, transferred, marketed, and redeemed.
2. Legal Classification of Stablecoins in Turkey
The first legal issue is classification. A stablecoin may be economically similar to digital dollars, but it is not automatically recognized as foreign currency, electronic money, deposit money, or legal tender under Turkish law.
The CBRT’s Regulation on the Disuse of Crypto Assets in Payments defines crypto assets in broad terms as intangible assets created virtually through distributed ledger technology or similar technology and distributed through digital networks, but not classified as fiat money, deposit money, electronic money, payment instruments, securities, or other capital market instruments. This definition is important because it places crypto assets, including stablecoins, outside the categories of money and payment instruments for payment law purposes.
This creates several consequences:
A stablecoin is not Turkish lira.
A stablecoin is not automatically foreign currency under Turkish foreign exchange law.
A stablecoin is not electronic money merely because it is pegged to a fiat currency.
A stablecoin is not a bank deposit.
A stablecoin is not legal tender.
A stablecoin cannot be freely used as a payment instrument in Turkey.
A stablecoin may still be a crypto asset subject to crypto platform, custody, AML, and tax rules.
A stablecoin may also trigger capital markets analysis if it grants investment rights, redemption claims, profit rights, or other rights resembling securities or capital market instruments.
The most important practical result is that stablecoins may be treated as crypto assets for platform trading and custody, but payment use is restricted.
3. The CBRT Payment Restriction
The central rule for stablecoins in Turkish payment law is the CBRT’s prohibition on the use of crypto assets in payments. The Regulation on the Disuse of Crypto Assets in Payments prohibits the direct or indirect use of crypto assets in payments and prohibits services for such use. It also prohibits payment service providers from developing business models that directly or indirectly use crypto assets in payment services or electronic money issuance.
This rule is highly relevant for stablecoins because stablecoins are often used globally for payment-like transfers. In Turkey, however, the payment restriction prevents businesses from using stablecoins as a normal payment method for goods and services.
Risky business models include:
Stablecoin merchant checkout systems.
Stablecoin payment gateways.
Stablecoin-funded prepaid cards.
Stablecoin debit card products.
Stablecoin-to-fiat instant payment models.
Digital wallets backed by stablecoins.
E-money balances issued against stablecoin reserves.
Merchant settlement in stablecoins.
Payroll or contractor payments in stablecoins.
Crypto payment buttons for Turkish customers.
A company cannot avoid the restriction by calling the transaction “settlement,” “digital value transfer,” “blockchain checkout,” or “stable value transfer” if the economic function is payment. Turkish law focuses on substance, not labels.
4. Stablecoins and Payment Institutions
Payment institutions and electronic money institutions must be especially careful. Law No. 6493 regulates payment services, payment institutions, and electronic money institutions in Turkey, while the CBRT supervises the sector. A licensed payment institution cannot simply add stablecoin functionality to its payment model unless the structure is legally permissible.
The CBRT payment restriction directly affects payment and e-money institutions because they are prohibited from developing business models involving the direct or indirect use of crypto assets in payment services or electronic money issuance.
This means a payment institution should avoid:
Using stablecoins to settle merchant transactions.
Allowing users to pay merchants with stablecoin balances.
Issuing electronic money backed by stablecoin reserves.
Offering a wallet where stablecoins function as payment balances.
Allowing stablecoin conversion as part of a payment flow.
Creating a bridge between stablecoin transfers and domestic payment services.
A payment institution may still cooperate with crypto asset service providers in limited legally permissible ways, but any structure involving payment functionality must be reviewed carefully.
5. Stablecoins and Electronic Money
Stablecoins are often confused with electronic money because both can represent digital value. However, under Turkish law, stablecoins are not automatically electronic money. Electronic money is regulated under Law No. 6493 and may be issued by authorized electronic money institutions. Stablecoins, by contrast, fall within crypto asset analysis unless a specific structure triggers another legal category.
The distinction is important. Electronic money is issued by a regulated institution against funds received and is used for payment transactions. Stablecoins are crypto assets created and transferred on blockchain or similar networks. Even if a stablecoin is backed by fiat reserves, it does not automatically become e-money in Turkey.
A fintech company should avoid describing stablecoin balances as “electronic money,” “digital lira,” “bank money,” or “deposit-like value” unless the legal structure supports those statements. Misleading terminology may create consumer protection, regulatory, and advertising risks.
6. Stablecoins and CMB Crypto Asset Regulation
Turkey’s crypto asset framework changed significantly after crypto asset service providers were brought under CMB supervision. The CMB issued Communiqué III-35/B.1 on establishment and operation of crypto asset service providers and Communiqué III-35/B.2 on operating procedures, activities, and capital adequacy. These regulations cover platforms, custody services, operating rules, listing, capital adequacy, and other obligations.
Stablecoins listed, traded, stored, or transferred through Turkish crypto asset platforms may fall within this framework. A platform listing stablecoins must consider its listing procedures, internal governance, custody structure, customer disclosures, AML controls, and transaction monitoring duties.
A crypto asset platform dealing with stablecoins should address:
Whether the stablecoin can be listed under platform policy.
Whether the issuer is identifiable.
Whether reserves are transparent.
Whether redemption rights exist.
Whether the stablecoin has de-pegging history.
Whether the token has sanctions exposure.
Whether the smart contract is audited.
Whether custody infrastructure is secure.
Whether stablecoin transfers are subject to MASAK limits.
Whether customer risk disclosures are adequate.
Stablecoins are not risk-free merely because they are designed to be stable. Platform listing committees should treat stablecoins as a distinct risk category.
7. Stablecoin Listing Risk
Listing a stablecoin on a Turkish crypto platform may create regulatory and civil liability risk if the platform fails to conduct proper due diligence. A stablecoin may appear liquid and widely used, but it may carry issuer risk, reserve risk, smart contract risk, regulatory risk, redemption risk, de-pegging risk, sanctions risk, and market concentration risk.
A platform should review:
Issuer identity and jurisdiction.
Reserve composition.
Reserve audit or attestation reports.
Redemption mechanism.
Historical peg stability.
Market liquidity.
Smart contract controls.
Blacklist or freeze functions.
Sanctions compliance.
Legal disputes involving the issuer.
Regulatory actions in other jurisdictions.
Consumer disclosures.
The platform should also avoid implying that listing means the stablecoin is guaranteed, state-approved, risk-free, or equivalent to bank deposits. Under CMB-related legal updates, crypto asset service providers are prohibited from making commitments guaranteeing specific returns on crypto assets, and investor protection disclosures are central to platform compliance.
8. MASAK, Travel Rule, and Stablecoin Transfer Limits
Stablecoins are closely monitored from an AML/CFT perspective because they are easy to transfer, often dollar-referenced, highly liquid, and widely used in crypto markets. Turkish authorities have focused on stablecoins in connection with laundering risks, illegal betting proceeds, fraud proceeds, and rapid cross-border value transfer.
Reuters reported in June 2025 that Turkey was preparing new crypto transaction controls, including waiting periods of 48 to 72 hours for crypto withdrawals where Travel Rule information is not applied and stablecoin transfer caps of USD 3,000 daily and USD 50,000 monthly. The report stated that the measures aimed to prevent laundering of criminal proceeds from illegal betting and fraud through crypto transactions.
Legal updates on MASAK’s 2025 measures similarly refer to stablecoin limits of USD 3,000 daily and USD 50,000 monthly for transfer and withdrawal transactions intermediated by crypto asset platforms, with higher limits for transactions where Travel Rule obligations are implemented.
For platforms, this means stablecoin compliance requires:
Customer identification.
Originator and beneficiary information collection.
Wallet screening.
Transaction monitoring.
Transfer limit controls.
Waiting period rules where required.
Travel Rule data sharing.
Sanctions and PEP screening.
Suspicious transaction escalation.
Record retention.
Stablecoin transfers should not be treated as low-risk simply because the token is price-stable. From an AML perspective, stablecoins can be high-risk because they are liquid, fast, and globally transferable.
9. Stablecoins and Suspicious Transaction Reporting
Under Law No. 5549, suspicious transactions must be reported when there is information, suspicion, or grounds for suspicion that assets involved in a transaction were obtained illegally or used for illegal purposes. Stablecoin transactions can generate suspicious transaction indicators because they may be used to move value rapidly between users, platforms, wallets, and jurisdictions.
Suspicious stablecoin red flags may include:
Rapid conversion from Turkish lira to stablecoins followed by withdrawal.
Multiple users sending stablecoins to the same external wallet.
Stablecoin transfers linked to illegal betting indicators.
Repeated deposits and withdrawals without economic rationale.
Use of newly opened accounts for high-volume stablecoin transfers.
Transfers involving mixers, high-risk exchanges, or sanctioned wallets.
Repeated stablecoin transfers just below limits.
Use of mule accounts.
Customer refusal to explain source of funds.
Mismatch between customer profile and stablecoin volume.
Transfers from fraud-related wallet clusters.
Unusual stablecoin activity after account takeover.
Crypto asset service providers must ensure that automated monitoring rules are adapted to stablecoin behavior. Stablecoin transaction monitoring should not simply copy rules designed for volatile crypto assets.
10. Custody of Stablecoins
Stablecoin custody creates legal and operational risks. A platform may hold stablecoins for customers in hot wallets, cold wallets, omnibus wallets, segregated wallets, or through a third-party custody provider. Under the CMB crypto asset framework, custody and management of customer crypto assets and private keys are regulated issues.
Custody risks include:
Private key compromise.
Hot wallet hacking.
Incorrect wallet address transfers.
Smart contract blacklisting.
Issuer freeze functions.
Failure of the stablecoin issuer.
Loss of peg.
Inability to redeem.
Customer asset segregation problems.
Inaccurate internal ledger records.
Custodian insolvency.
Stablecoins may also be frozen by issuers in certain cases, depending on the token’s smart contract and issuer policy. This should be disclosed to customers where relevant. A customer may assume that stablecoins are always freely transferable, but some stablecoins can be frozen or blacklisted at the contract level.
Crypto asset service providers should maintain:
Clear custody terms.
Wallet security procedures.
Customer asset segregation.
Daily reconciliation.
Blockchain transaction records.
Withdrawal approval controls.
Incident response plans.
Customer disclosure of issuer-related risks.
11. Stablecoins Are Not Bank Deposits
A major consumer protection issue is the misconception that stablecoins are equivalent to bank deposits or foreign currency accounts. They are not. A stablecoin holder generally does not have the same rights as a bank depositor unless the structure legally provides such rights, which is usually not the case for ordinary stablecoin holdings.
Important distinctions include:
A stablecoin is not legal tender.
A stablecoin is not a bank deposit.
A stablecoin is not automatically covered by deposit insurance.
A stablecoin holder may not have a direct claim against reserve assets.
A stablecoin may de-peg.
A stablecoin issuer may become insolvent.
A stablecoin may be frozen or restricted.
A platform may suspend withdrawals for compliance or technical reasons.
A stablecoin may be affected by foreign regulatory actions.
Crypto platforms and fintech companies should avoid language suggesting that stablecoins are “digital dollars,” “guaranteed dollars,” “safe deposits,” or “risk-free cash equivalents” unless properly qualified. Marketing should explain that stablecoins carry issuer, reserve, market, custody, technology, and regulatory risks.
12. Stablecoins and Consumer Protection
Although stablecoins are mainly used by crypto investors, consumer protection issues may still arise where retail users buy, hold, transfer, or store stablecoins through platforms. Disputes may involve failed withdrawals, account freezes, incorrect transfers, platform outages, de-pegging events, hidden fees, misleading marketing, custody failures, or unauthorized account access.
Consumer-facing stablecoin platforms should disclose:
The legal nature of stablecoins.
The fact that stablecoins are crypto assets.
Payment restrictions in Turkey.
Issuer and reserve risk.
Redemption limitations.
Transfer limits and waiting periods.
Fees and spreads.
Custody arrangements.
Withdrawal rules.
AML/KYC restrictions.
Risks of external wallet transfers.
Irreversibility of blockchain transactions.
Complaint channels.
A platform that markets stablecoins as safe digital cash without explaining these risks may face consumer claims and regulatory scrutiny.
13. Stablecoins and De-Pegging Risk
De-pegging occurs when a stablecoin loses its intended reference value. This may happen because of reserve problems, market panic, smart contract failure, regulatory action, liquidity crisis, algorithmic failure, issuer insolvency, or loss of market confidence.
De-pegging risk is legally important because users may claim that they were misled about stability. The word “stablecoin” itself can create expectations. Platforms and issuers should therefore disclose that stability is an objective, not a legal guarantee.
Risk disclosure should state:
The stablecoin may lose its peg.
The issuer may fail to maintain reserves.
Redemption may be delayed or unavailable.
Secondary market price may differ from reference value.
Platform listing does not guarantee value stability.
Customers may suffer losses during market stress.
Algorithmic stablecoins may carry higher risk.
Disclosures should be clear and visible, not hidden in long technical terms.
14. Stablecoins and Cross-Border Transfers
Stablecoins are commonly used for cross-border value transfer. This creates legal risk under AML, sanctions, tax, foreign exchange, and data protection rules. A Turkish user may send stablecoins to a foreign exchange, self-custody wallet, decentralized protocol, or another person abroad. A foreign platform may target Turkish users with stablecoin services.
Cross-border stablecoin risks include:
Unlicensed foreign platform access.
Sanctions exposure.
Travel Rule compliance gaps.
High-risk wallet counterparties.
Tax reporting difficulty.
Foreign issuer legal risk.
Data transfer under KVKK.
Recovery difficulty after fraud.
Consumer disputes with foreign platforms.
MASAK-related investigation risk.
Foreign platforms targeting Turkish residents may also trigger Turkish crypto asset service provider rules if they actively market to Turkish users. Turkish-language interfaces, local advertising, Turkish customer support, and Turkish market campaigns increase regulatory risk.
15. Stablecoins and DeFi
Stablecoins are central to decentralized finance. Users may deposit stablecoins into lending protocols, liquidity pools, decentralized exchanges, yield farms, bridges, and synthetic asset platforms. These activities create additional legal uncertainty in Turkey.
DeFi stablecoin risks include:
No identifiable platform operator.
Smart contract bugs.
Protocol hacks.
Bridge failures.
Impermanent loss.
Liquidation.
Unclear tax treatment.
AML monitoring difficulty.
No customer support.
No regulated custody.
No clear governing law.
Use of stablecoins in DeFi may also be difficult to reconcile with Turkish AML expectations, especially where assets move through unhosted wallets, mixers, cross-chain bridges, or decentralized protocols. A crypto asset service provider that interacts with DeFi-related stablecoin flows should apply enhanced monitoring.
16. Stablecoins and Taxation
Stablecoin taxation remains legally uncertain in Turkey. A stablecoin trade, sale, transfer, or conversion may raise questions about capital gains, commercial income, foreign exchange valuation, platform withholding, transaction levies, and annual declaration obligations.
Reuters reported in March 2026 that Turkey’s ruling AK Party submitted a draft law proposing a 10% withholding tax on income and gains from crypto asset transactions conducted on authorized platforms, while gains outside authorized platforms would be taxed through annual declarations. The same draft reportedly included a 0.03% transaction levy on crypto asset service providers for sale and transfer transactions they conduct or intermediate.
Because this was reported as a draft law, the final enacted position must be verified before relying on it. However, if similar rules enter into force, stablecoin transactions could become operationally important for platforms because stablecoins are used heavily in crypto trading pairs and transfers.
Tax questions include:
Is converting Turkish lira to stablecoin a taxable event?
Is converting stablecoin to another crypto asset taxable?
Is converting crypto gains into stablecoin a realization event?
How is gain calculated if the stablecoin references USD?
How are stablecoin transfers between own wallets treated?
How are platform fees deducted?
How are losses handled?
How are DeFi stablecoin yields taxed?
How are stablecoin airdrops or rewards treated?
Crypto users and platforms should maintain detailed transaction records until clearer tax practice develops.
17. Stablecoins and KVKK
Stablecoin platforms process personal data, including identity documents, wallet addresses, transaction records, device data, IP logs, risk scores, sanctions screening results, and suspicious activity records. Under KVKK, personal data must be processed lawfully, fairly, securely, proportionately, and for specific purposes.
Stablecoin transactions create special privacy issues because blockchain records may be public and permanent. A wallet address may become personal data if linked to an identifiable person. A platform that connects KYC data with wallet addresses creates a powerful dataset that must be protected carefully.
KVKK risks include:
Excessive data collection.
Unclear privacy notices.
Cross-border transfer to foreign analytics vendors.
Use of blockchain analytics without proper data mapping.
Sharing wallet data with group companies.
Storing KYC data without adequate security.
Using transaction data for unrelated marketing.
Data breach involving identity and wallet data.
Platforms should prepare privacy notices, data processing inventories, vendor agreements, cross-border transfer assessments, retention policies, and breach response procedures.
18. Stablecoins and Cybersecurity
Stablecoins are attractive targets for hackers because they are liquid and transferable. A compromised account can be drained quickly. A platform’s hot wallet may be attacked. A user may be tricked through phishing into approving a stablecoin withdrawal.
Cybersecurity risks include:
Account takeover.
Phishing.
SIM swap attacks.
Malware.
API compromise.
Hot wallet hacking.
Private key theft.
Fake customer support scams.
Withdrawal address manipulation.
Smart contract vulnerabilities.
Insider fraud.
Platforms should implement:
Strong customer authentication.
Device binding.
Withdrawal address whitelisting.
Risk-based withdrawal delays.
Hot wallet limits.
Cold wallet storage.
Multi-signature approvals.
Blockchain monitoring.
Fraud detection.
Incident response.
Tamper-resistant logs.
Customer education.
In disputes, platforms must be able to prove whether a withdrawal was authorized and whether reasonable security controls were in place.
19. Stablecoin Business Models That Require Legal Review
Any company considering stablecoin-related services in Turkey should obtain legal review if the model includes:
Stablecoin trading.
Stablecoin custody.
Stablecoin wallet services.
Stablecoin payment processing.
Stablecoin merchant settlement.
Stablecoin-backed digital wallets.
Stablecoin lending.
Stablecoin staking or yield.
Stablecoin remittance.
Stablecoin payroll.
Stablecoin cards.
Stablecoin integration with payment institutions.
Stablecoin-based investment products.
Stablecoin reserve management.
Stablecoin issuance.
Stablecoin listing on a platform.
Stablecoin transfers for Turkish users.
Some of these models may be permissible if structured properly under crypto asset rules. Others may be restricted, especially if they involve payments. The legal distinction between trading, custody, transfer, investment, and payment must be clear.
20. Practical Compliance Checklist for Stablecoin Platforms in Turkey
A crypto asset service provider or fintech company dealing with stablecoins should consider:
Classify the stablecoin model legally.
Confirm whether the activity is trading, custody, transfer, investment, payment, or e-money-related.
Avoid direct or indirect payment use prohibited by CBRT rules.
Review CMB crypto asset service provider obligations.
Apply listing due diligence for each stablecoin.
Review issuer, reserve, redemption, and de-pegging risks.
Prepare customer risk disclosures.
Implement MASAK-compliant KYC.
Apply Travel Rule procedures.
Implement stablecoin transfer limits where required.
Monitor suspicious stablecoin patterns.
Screen wallet addresses.
Preserve blockchain transaction records.
Establish custody and reconciliation procedures.
Protect customer data under KVKK.
Review cross-border data transfers.
Prepare cybersecurity controls.
Review tax reporting and proposed tax changes.
Train customer support and compliance teams.
Maintain audit-ready records.
This checklist must be adapted to the actual business model. A platform listing stablecoins, a custody provider, a wallet operator, a DeFi gateway, and a foreign exchange targeting Turkish users will not have the same legal risk profile.
Why Legal Support Is Important
Stablecoin law in Turkey requires coordination between crypto regulation, payment law, AML, data protection, tax, cybersecurity, consumer protection, and capital markets law. A stablecoin product may look simple to users, but its legal structure can be complex.
A crypto and fintech lawyer can assist with:
Stablecoin legal classification.
CBRT payment restriction analysis.
CMB crypto asset service provider compliance.
Stablecoin listing policy review.
MASAK and Travel Rule procedures.
Stablecoin transfer limit compliance.
Custody agreement drafting.
Customer disclosure preparation.
KVKK privacy documentation.
Cross-border platform analysis.
Tax risk coordination.
Consumer dispute strategy.
Regulatory correspondence.
Administrative sanction defense.
Legal support should begin before launch. Once users have started trading, holding, or transferring stablecoins, correcting a non-compliant structure may become difficult, costly, and risky.
Conclusion
Stablecoins are one of the most important crypto asset categories in Turkey, but they are also one of the most legally sensitive. They are widely used for trading, liquidity, value preservation, and cross-border crypto transfers. However, Turkish law does not treat stablecoins as ordinary money, bank deposits, electronic money, or unrestricted payment instruments.
The CBRT’s crypto payment regulation prohibits the direct or indirect use of crypto assets in payments and restricts payment service providers from developing business models involving crypto assets in payment services or electronic money issuance. This is the most important rule for stablecoin payment models in Turkey.
At the same time, stablecoins may be listed, traded, transferred, and custodied within the developing CMB crypto asset service provider framework if the relevant platform complies with applicable rules. MASAK controls are also critical, especially after 2025 measures targeting crypto laundering risks, Travel Rule compliance, and stablecoin transfer limits.
The key legal point is that stablecoins are not risk-free digital cash. They involve issuer risk, reserve risk, de-pegging risk, custody risk, AML risk, sanctions risk, tax uncertainty, data protection risk, and payment law restrictions.
For fintech companies, crypto platforms, investors, and foreign exchanges, stablecoin compliance in Turkey requires careful legal architecture. The safest approach is to separate trading and custody from payment use, maintain strong AML/KYC controls, disclose risks clearly, protect customer data, monitor tax developments, and ensure that stablecoin services are provided only within the legally permitted framework.
Yanıt yok