Introduction
Counterfeit and non-original products are a serious consumer protection issue in Turkey. Consumers may purchase shoes, bags, cosmetics, perfumes, watches, electronics, mobile phone accessories, spare parts, clothing, toys, medical products, supplements, luxury goods, automotive parts, software, or household products believing that they are original, branded, authentic, licensed, imported, or authorized. After payment, the consumer may discover that the product is fake, imitation, refurbished, gray-market, unsafe, unbranded, or materially different from what was advertised.
These disputes are not only about disappointment. Counterfeit and non-original products may cause financial loss, health and safety risks, data security problems, warranty denial, product failure, and even legal consequences for sellers. A fake cosmetic product may harm the skin. A counterfeit charger may create fire risk. A non-original vehicle spare part may affect safety. A fake luxury product may have no resale value. A non-original phone accessory may damage the device. A counterfeit medicine or medical product may endanger life.
Under Turkish law, the consumer may have several legal remedies. The dispute may be evaluated under Law No. 6502 on the Protection of Consumers, especially defective goods, misleading advertising, unfair commercial practices, distance contracts, and Consumer Arbitration Committee rules. In some cases, the matter may also involve Industrial Property Law No. 6769, trademark infringement, product safety rules, customs measures, administrative complaints, and criminal law.
Law No. 6502 protects the consumer’s health, safety, and economic interests and provides remedies for defective goods and services. The Ministry of Trade explains that if a product is defective, the consumer may choose among refund by withdrawal from the contract, replacement with a defect-free equivalent, free repair, or price reduction. Defects appearing within six months from delivery are presumed to have existed at delivery unless the nature of the product or defect makes that presumption inappropriate.
What Is a Counterfeit Product?
A counterfeit product is generally a product that uses a protected trademark, logo, design, packaging, or brand identity without authorization in a way that misleads consumers into believing that the product is original. Counterfeits are common in fashion, cosmetics, electronics, perfumes, bags, watches, shoes, spare parts, and accessories.
The trademark dimension is important. TÜRKPATENT explains that a trademark may consist of signs such as words, shapes, colors, letters, numbers, sounds, and the form of goods or packaging, provided that it distinguishes one undertaking’s goods or services from another and can be shown clearly in the register. Law No. 6769 on Industrial Property is the central statute regulating industrial property rights in Türkiye, including trademarks, and WIPO identifies it as Türkiye’s Law No. 6769 on Industrial Property.
From the consumer’s perspective, the central issue is often simpler: the consumer believed they were buying an original branded product, but the seller delivered a fake, imitation, or unauthorized product. In consumer law terms, that product may be defective because it lacks the promised quality, commercial identity, origin, authenticity, and value.
Counterfeit vs. Non-Original vs. Refurbished Products
Not every non-original product is necessarily counterfeit, but many non-original product disputes still create consumer rights.
A counterfeit product imitates a protected brand without authorization. For example, a fake branded shoe or perfume sold as original is a counterfeit.
A non-original product may be an aftermarket, compatible, or unbranded product. It may be lawful if clearly disclosed. For example, a compatible phone charger or non-original vehicle spare part may be sold lawfully if the seller clearly states that it is not original.
A refurbished product may be a used product restored, repaired, or renewed for resale. It may be lawful if clearly disclosed as refurbished and if warranty and condition information are transparent.
A gray-market product may be an original product imported through unofficial distribution channels. It may be original in brand terms but may create warranty, language, service, or compliance problems if not properly disclosed.
The legal problem arises when the seller misrepresents the product. If a seller advertises a product as “original,” “authorized dealer product,” “brand guaranteed,” “imported original,” “genuine,” “licensed,” “factory product,” or “official,” the seller should be able to prove that claim.
Counterfeit Products as Defective Goods
A fake or non-original product sold as original will generally be a strong example of a defective good. The consumer purchased the product based on a material representation: authenticity. If the product is not authentic, it does not conform to the contract.
Under Turkish consumer protection guidance, defective goods may include products that do not have the qualities stated by the seller, in advertisements, labels, internet portals, or promotional materials, or that contain deficiencies reducing the expected benefit. In defective goods cases, the consumer may choose refund, replacement, free repair, or price reduction.
In counterfeit disputes, refund is often the most suitable remedy. Replacement may also be possible if the seller can provide an authentic product. Free repair usually does not make sense because the problem is not a repairable defect; it is the product’s lack of authenticity. Price reduction may be inadequate where the consumer would not have purchased the product at all had they known it was fake.
For example, a consumer who buys a luxury watch advertised as original does not merely receive a lower-quality watch if it is counterfeit. The consumer receives a fundamentally different product. The same applies to branded shoes, bags, cosmetics, perfumes, electronics, and spare parts.
The Six-Month Presumption and Burden of Proof
The six-month presumption can help consumers in defective goods disputes. The Ministry of Trade states that defects appearing within six months from delivery are presumed to have existed at delivery, and the seller must prove that the product was not defective.
In counterfeit disputes, the consumer should still gather evidence quickly. A seller may argue that the product was altered, replaced, misused, or not the same product delivered. Therefore, the consumer should preserve packaging, labels, serial numbers, QR codes, invoice, cargo records, unboxing videos, product photos, and expert or brand service reports.
The consumer should also avoid returning the product without keeping strong evidence. In some cases, the fake product itself may be the most important evidence. If the consumer must return it, photographs, videos, and cargo records should be preserved.
Consumer’s Elective Rights
When a product is defective, the consumer may generally choose among four rights: refund by withdrawing from the contract, replacement with a defect-free equivalent, free repair, or price reduction. The seller must fulfill the consumer’s chosen remedy where the legal requirements are met.
In counterfeit and non-original product cases, the most common claims are:
Full refund: The consumer returns the fake product and requests repayment of the sale price.
Replacement with original product: The consumer requests delivery of the authentic product promised in the advertisement or contract.
Price reduction: This may be relevant where the product is not fake but was misrepresented as original-equivalent, premium, imported, or new.
Compensation: If the fake product caused additional damage, the consumer may claim compensation under general legal principles where conditions are met. For example, a counterfeit charger damaging a phone or a fake cosmetic product causing medical expenses may create additional claims.
The remedy should be selected strategically. In most fake branded product cases, refund and compensation are more persuasive than repair.
Misleading Advertising and Fake Product Claims
Counterfeit products are often sold through misleading advertising. Sellers may use expressions such as “original product,” “imported original,” “factory outlet,” “authentic,” “licensed,” “official store,” “brand guaranteed,” “invoice guaranteed,” or “100% genuine.” If these claims are false or cannot be proven, the advertisement may be misleading.
The Ministry of Trade states that commercial advertisements must comply with principles determined by the Advertising Board, must be accurate and honest, and must not deceive consumers or exploit their lack of experience or knowledge. The Advertising Board has also examined advertisements involving imitation or counterfeit products; in one 2025 bulletin, it considered advertisements for imitation/fake products misleading and contrary to fair competition principles, referring to Law No. 6502 and the Commercial Advertising and Unfair Commercial Practices Regulation.
This is important because a consumer claim does not have to rely only on the physical product. The advertisement, product page, social media post, influencer promotion, WhatsApp message, and seller statement may all prove that the seller represented the product as original.
Consumers should preserve screenshots before the seller deletes or changes the advertisement.
Online Marketplace Counterfeit Disputes
Counterfeit product disputes are especially common in online marketplaces. A consumer may buy from a third-party seller on a well-known platform and assume the product is reliable because the platform is reputable. However, the actual seller may be a marketplace merchant.
Online marketplace disputes should identify three possible actors:
Seller: The party that listed and sold the product.
Platform or intermediary: The marketplace enabling the transaction, payment, communication, return, and complaint process.
Importer or distributor: The party that supplied the product to the seller, if identifiable.
Distance contract rules are often relevant because marketplace purchases are usually made online. The Ministry of Trade explains that in distance contracts, the seller must refund the consumer within 14 days after receiving the withdrawal notice, and the consumer must return the product within 10 days after sending the withdrawal notice.
However, counterfeit disputes should not be reduced to ordinary withdrawal. Even if the 14-day withdrawal period has passed, the consumer may still have defective goods rights if the product is fake or non-original despite being sold as original.
Social Media Sales and Fake Products
Counterfeit products are frequently sold through social media accounts, messaging apps, fake brand pages, temporary online shops, and influencer-linked stores. These sellers may use brand photos, stolen product images, fake reviews, limited-time campaigns, and bank-transfer payment requests.
The Ministry of Trade warned consumers in 2025 about fraud attempts through social media and digital channels, including fake product sales, imitation accounts, phishing, deceptive reservations, fake giveaways, and advertisements.
Consumers should be cautious when sellers avoid secure payment, refuse invoices, use personal bank accounts, claim “original without box,” or sell luxury products at unrealistically low prices. A very low price does not always prove counterfeiting, but it is often a warning sign.
If a fake product is purchased through social media, the consumer should preserve the account name, profile link, messages, payment receipt, cargo label, product photos, and any advertisement screenshots. If the seller disappears, criminal complaint and bank/payment objection may also be considered.
Product Safety Risks of Counterfeit Goods
Counterfeit products are not only economic defects. They may be unsafe. Fake cosmetics may contain harmful substances. Counterfeit electrical goods may overheat. Fake toys may contain unsafe materials. Imitation automotive parts may fail during use. Non-original batteries may explode or damage devices.
Turkey’s GÜBİS – Unsafe Product Information System is a public platform where products found unsafe by authorized market surveillance and inspection authorities are announced. GÜBİS states that it publishes products determined to be unsafe by competent authorities, and that each notification concerns the specific product in the notification rather than all products of the producer.
If a consumer suspects that a counterfeit or non-original product is unsafe, the issue may require more than a refund request. The consumer may need to stop using the product, preserve evidence, check GÜBİS, notify the seller or platform, and submit a complaint to relevant authorities where necessary.
Trademark Infringement and Consumer Remedies
Counterfeit products may also involve trademark infringement. The trademark owner, not usually the consumer, is the primary party entitled to bring trademark infringement claims under industrial property law. However, the consumer may still benefit from the fact that counterfeit sales are legally wrongful and commercially misleading.
Law No. 6769 on Industrial Property regulates trademark protection in Turkey. WIPO notes that the law introduced changes to Türkiye’s industrial property system and reinforced trademark protection, including criminal provisions on trademark infringements. The Ministry of Trade’s customs FAQ also addresses intellectual property rights and states that simply removing marks or labels is not enough to change the nature of infringing goods in customs-related procedures.
From the consumer perspective, the key point is this: the consumer does not need to be the trademark owner to claim refund from the seller. The consumer’s claim is based on receiving a defective and misrepresented product.
Customs, Imports, and “Original Imported Product” Claims
Some sellers describe products as “imported original,” “overseas product,” “factory outlet,” or “parallel import.” These expressions can be lawful only if they reflect reality and do not mislead the consumer.
If a product is original but imported outside the official Turkish distribution network, the seller should clearly disclose warranty conditions, language, service availability, plug compatibility, local compliance, and return rules. If the product is not original, the seller cannot hide behind vague import language.
A consumer buying an imported product should request invoice, warranty information, importer details, serial number, and written confirmation of authenticity. If the product is later rejected by the brand’s authorized service as non-original or unsupported, that report may become strong evidence.
Evidence in Counterfeit Product Disputes
Evidence is the foundation of a successful claim. Consumers should preserve:
- Invoice or receipt
- Online order confirmation
- Payment receipt or bank transfer record
- Product page screenshots
- Seller profile screenshots
- Advertisement screenshots
- WhatsApp, email, SMS, or platform messages
- Product packaging
- Labels, tags, barcodes, QR codes, serial numbers
- Cargo label and delivery records
- Unboxing video
- Photos of product details
- Comparison photos with original products
- Brand service report or authenticity rejection
- Expert report, if available
- Seller’s refund refusal
- Platform complaint records
- GÜBİS record, if product safety is involved
The best evidence is often collected immediately after delivery. Consumers should photograph the packaging before opening, record unboxing for high-value products, and avoid destroying labels or seals.
How to Prove a Product Is Fake or Non-Original
Proving counterfeiting may be simple or difficult depending on the product. In some cases, the fake is obvious: wrong logo, misspelled brand name, poor packaging, missing serial number, or different design. In other cases, expert review may be necessary.
Useful proof may include:
Brand service report: An authorized service may state that the product is not original, not registered, counterfeit, incompatible, or unsupported.
Serial number verification: Some brands allow online serial number checks.
QR code or barcode mismatch: A mismatch may support suspicion, though it may not be conclusive alone.
Expert report: Technical experts may examine materials, components, software, packaging, or product structure.
Comparison evidence: Side-by-side comparison with authentic products may help, especially for cosmetics, accessories, shoes, and electronics.
Seller admission: Messages such as “it is original-quality,” “same factory,” or “A-class replica” may prove the product was not genuine.
The consumer should not rely only on personal belief. A formal claim is stronger when supported by objective evidence.
Refund Request Letter Structure
A strong refund request should be written, clear, and legal. It may state:
“I purchased [product] from [seller/platform] on [date] for [amount]. The product was advertised and sold as original/authentic/branded. After delivery, it became clear that the product is counterfeit/non-original/not as advertised. This constitutes a defective good under Turkish Consumer Law. I exercise my right to withdraw from the contract and request refund of the full sale price, including delivery costs, within the legal period. I also reserve my right to claim compensation and file complaints before relevant authorities.”
If there is an authorized service report, it should be attached. If the product is unsafe, the consumer should also state that they stopped using it and reserve product safety complaint rights.
Consumer Arbitration Committees
If the seller or platform refuses refund, the consumer may apply to the Consumer Arbitration Committee if the dispute value is below the statutory threshold. For 2026, the Ministry of Trade announced that consumer disputes below TRY 186,000 may be brought before Provincial or District Consumer Arbitration Committees. Ministry guidance also states that applications may be made personally or through an attorney, by hand, by post, or electronically through e-Government via TÜBİS, and oral applications are not accepted.
Most counterfeit product disputes fall below this threshold, especially clothing, shoes, cosmetics, perfumes, accessories, small electronics, and spare parts. The application should include the invoice, order confirmation, product page screenshot, seller messages, authenticity evidence, refund request, and seller refusal.
Consumer Courts and Mandatory Mediation
If the dispute value is TRY 186,000 or more in 2026, Consumer Arbitration Committees cannot decide the dispute. Such disputes require mandatory mediation and then Consumer Court litigation if mediation fails. This may occur in high-value luxury goods, jewelry, watches, electronics, vehicle parts, medical devices, or bulk consumer purchases.
A Consumer Court petition should identify:
- The product and seller
- The advertisement or authenticity promise
- Payment and delivery
- Why the product is counterfeit or non-original
- Evidence proving non-authenticity
- The consumer’s chosen remedy
- Refund, replacement, price reduction, or compensation request
- Platform liability, if applicable
- Product safety concerns, if any
Expert examination may be necessary, especially for expensive watches, electronics, medical devices, vehicle parts, and branded luxury goods.
Criminal Complaint and Administrative Complaints
Some counterfeit sales may also involve fraud, trademark infringement, unsafe products, or organized illegal trade. A consumer may consider a criminal complaint if the seller intentionally deceived buyers, used fake accounts, disappeared after payment, or sold large quantities of fake branded goods.
Administrative complaints may also be relevant. If misleading advertising is involved, the Advertising Board may be relevant. If the product is unsafe, market surveillance authorities may be relevant. If the product is sold through a marketplace, the platform should also be notified.
A consumer complaint for refund and a public complaint about unsafe or counterfeit products can proceed separately. Refund compensates the consumer; administrative or criminal complaints address public enforcement.
Online Platform Liability
Online platforms may argue that they are only intermediaries. This may be true in some cases, but platform conduct should still be examined. If the platform collected payment, displayed “original product guarantee,” promoted the seller, ignored repeated fake product complaints, controlled return procedures, or refused to process a valid refund request, the platform may become relevant in the consumer dispute.
The consumer should include the platform in correspondence and preserve all platform complaint records. If the platform has a buyer protection system, the consumer should use it within the platform deadlines but should not assume that platform policy replaces legal rights.
Practical Advice for Consumers
Consumers should be cautious with unusually low prices, sellers who refuse invoices, personal bank account payments, vague authenticity claims, “replica quality” wording, and social media accounts with no clear business identity.
Before buying, consumers should check seller identity, invoice availability, return policy, product reviews, official distributor lists, and brand verification methods. For expensive products, the consumer should ask written questions: “Is this product original?” “Will you issue an invoice?” “Is it covered by manufacturer warranty?” “Are you an authorized seller?” Written answers become evidence.
After delivery, consumers should inspect packaging, serial numbers, labels, and product quality immediately. If authenticity is doubtful, they should not use the product extensively and should seek verification.
Practical Advice for Sellers and Marketplaces
Sellers should never advertise non-original products as original. If a product is aftermarket, compatible, refurbished, outlet, imported, or not covered by official warranty, this must be disclosed clearly before sale. Vague wording is risky.
Marketplaces should monitor repeated counterfeit complaints, remove suspicious listings, preserve seller identity records, and provide effective complaint systems. Fake product sales damage platform trust and may create legal exposure depending on the platform’s role.
Businesses should keep supplier invoices, importer records, authorization documents, authenticity certificates, warranty documents, and product traceability records. If authenticity is challenged, the seller should prove its claim with documents, not slogans.
Conclusion
Consumer rights against counterfeit and non-original products in Turkey are strong when the product was sold as original, authentic, branded, licensed, or authorized but delivered otherwise. Such products may constitute defective goods under Law No. 6502, giving the consumer the right to request refund, replacement, price reduction, or other remedies depending on the facts. Defects appearing within six months from delivery are presumed to have existed at delivery, placing an important burden on the seller.
Counterfeit product disputes may also involve misleading advertising and unfair commercial practices. Commercial advertisements must be accurate and honest, and must not deceive consumers or exploit their lack of knowledge. Where fake products create safety risks, consumers should also consider product safety routes and check public unsafe product announcements through GÜBİS.
For 2026, disputes below TRY 186,000 generally fall within Consumer Arbitration Committee jurisdiction, while higher-value disputes require mandatory mediation and Consumer Court proceedings.
For consumers, the strongest strategy is documentation: preserve invoices, screenshots, packaging, labels, serial numbers, messages, brand service reports, and refund requests. For sellers and platforms, the safest strategy is transparency: do not call a product original unless it can be proven, disclose non-original or refurbished status clearly, and respond to authenticity complaints with evidence.
In Turkey, counterfeit and non-original product disputes are not merely commercial disagreements. They involve consumer protection, advertising law, product safety, trademark rights, and public trust in the marketplace. A consumer who pays for an original product has the legal right to receive what was promised—or to seek effective remedies when that promise is broken.
Yanıt yok