Transportation of Goods Law in Turkey: A Practical Legal Guide for Shippers, Carriers & Logistics Companies
Turkey sits on one of the world’s busiest trade corridors, which means transportation disputes are not “rare exceptions”—they are a predictable business risk. Whether you ship by road from Istanbul to the EU, export via Turkish ports, move cargo by air, or use multimodal logistics solutions, you should assume that a loss, damage, theft, temperature deviation, delay, or documentation problem will eventually occur. The real question is whether your contracts, documents, and internal processes are designed to control liability and win claims under the correct legal regime.
This guide explains the core legal rules governing the transportation (carriage) of goods in Turkey, how liability is allocated, what claim deadlines matter most, and how businesses can reduce disputes before they happen.
1) The legal framework: domestic rules + international conventions
Transportation of goods is regulated in Turkey mainly through:
- Domestic law: the transport provisions of the Turkish Commercial Code (TCC), which modernized road carriage rules and aligns many concepts with international standards.
- International conventions (often decisive in cross-border shipments):
- Road: the CMR Convention (Contract for the International Carriage of Goods by Road), including its strict liability structure and short limitation periods.
- Air: the Montreal Convention (1999)—Turkey is a party (important for air cargo and combined logistics where the air leg is relevant).
- Sea: Turkey’s sea-carriage regime interacts with international maritime rules and the cargo liability/time-bar structure under Turkish maritime law.
- Rail (international): the COTIF/CIM framework administered by OTIF—Turkey is shown as a member/applying the appendices in OTIF’s own materials.
Why this matters: in practice, the “right law” is not chosen by preference; it is chosen by the mode of transport, the route, and the contract structure. If you argue the wrong regime, you can lose a strong claim on procedural grounds (especially limitation periods).
2) What counts as a “transportation of goods” dispute?
Typical disputes in Turkey include:
- Cargo theft, pilferage, partial loss
- Damage: breakage, moisture, contamination, corrosion, crushing
- Temperature-controlled failures (cold chain)
- Late delivery (and downstream penalties)
- Misdelivery / delivery without proper release instructions
- Wrong customs documentation, holds, demurrage and storage costs
- Carrier’s “liability limitation” defenses (SDR-based caps)
- Sub-carrier/actual carrier disputes and recourse actions
- Freight and detention fee disputes
3) Parties and risk allocation: who is who?
In Turkish transport disputes, liability depends heavily on party roles. In one supply chain, you may have:
- Consignor/Sender (shipper): delivers goods for carriage, provides instructions and documents.
- Carrier: undertakes carriage against payment and is typically liable for loss/damage/delay during the custody period.
- Consignee: entitled to delivery, may have claim rights depending on the contract/document set.
- Freight forwarder / logistics provider: may act as an agent (organizing) or as a contractual carrier (assuming carriage liability). Misclassification is a common litigation trigger.
- Actual/sub-carrier: physically performs part of the trip.
Practical risk: many “logistics companies” market themselves as organizers but sign documents that make them look like the contractual carrier—which expands liability dramatically.
4) Key transport documents you must get right
Good claims are built on good paperwork. The most relevant documents include:
Road (domestic + international)
- Transport agreement / framework logistics contract
- Consignment note (CMR note for international road)
- Delivery documents: POD (proof of delivery), reservation records
- Weight/packaging evidence: loading photos, tally sheets, seals
CMR is especially document-driven; the consignment note shapes the dispute narrative.
Sea
- Bill of lading (B/L) (negotiable or non-negotiable)
- Sea waybill, mate’s receipt
- Booking confirmations, stowage plans (where available)
Air
- Air waybill (AWB), cargo manifests, handling reports
Air cargo often turns into a “documentation + time bar” race. Turkey’s Montreal Convention status matters here.
Rail / Multimodal
- Rail consignment note (international legs may fall under CIM rules)
- Multimodal transport document (MTD) / combined transport bill
5) Core liability concept: custody-based responsibility + limited defenses
Across most modern carriage regimes applied in Turkey, a central idea appears:
The carrier is typically responsible for loss/damage occurring between taking over the goods and delivering them, unless it proves legally recognized exoneration grounds.
This structure is very clear in road transport law influenced by the CMR approach.
Road carriage: strict-ish liability logic + limited exoneration
The CMR model (and domestic alignment) focuses on:
- A defined liability period (takeover → delivery)
- Carrier defenses (e.g., inherent defect, claimant’s fault, unavoidable circumstances)
- Liability limits (SDR-based) unless special declarations or qualified fault exists
The CMR’s limitation rule (1 year / 3 years in aggravated cases) is explicit in the convention text.
6) Liability caps: the 8.33 SDR/kg issue (road carriage)
In many road cargo disputes, the fight is not “is there liability?” but “how much can you recover?”
Under Turkish road carriage rules (TCC framework), compensation can be limited—commonly expressed as 8.33 SDR per kilogram for loss/damage calculations in the standard scenario.
How businesses lose money here
- The shipper never declares higher value/special interest where legally available.
- The contract is silent on value declaration, packaging standards, handling requirements.
- Evidence of “qualified fault / wilful misconduct” is not preserved early.
What courts emphasize
Turkish high-court practice (Yargıtay) is frequently discussed in doctrine as requiring correct application of the statutory limitation/cap framework in cargo disputes—especially where decision-makers ignore the legal cap mechanics.
7) Time bars and limitation periods: the #1 claim killer
Transport law is unforgiving about time.
International road carriage (CMR)
The CMR states:
- General limitation period: 1 year
- 3 years in cases of wilful misconduct/equivalent fault
And it also defines when time starts running (delivery date, presumed loss timelines, etc.).
Domestic road carriage under Turkish Commercial Code
Turkish commentary explains that TCC road-carriage limitation periods were set in line with the CMR logic: generally one year, extended to three years in intent/wilful misconduct scenarios.
Sea carriage time bars
For maritime cargo claims, Turkish maritime law includes specific time-bar rules; one widely referenced rule is a one-year extinction/limitation approach in cargo loss/damage claims under relevant TCC maritime provisions (topic-specific and highly technical).
Air cargo (Montreal Convention)
Because Turkey is a party to the Montreal Convention, international air carriage of cargo commonly falls into that treaty framework (and its own time limits and liability rules).
Practical takeaway: your claim strategy must start on Day 1, not when negotiations fail.
8) Delay claims: not every delay is recoverable the way you think
Delay claims are often commercially significant (production stops, missed retail windows, penalties under supply contracts). But legally:
- Many regimes treat delay differently than physical loss/damage.
- Contracts often exclude consequential losses, but badly drafted clauses can be unenforceable or ineffective against mandatory rules.
- Evidence is crucial: planned ETA, agreed time limit, communications, and causation.
Under CMR-oriented logic, delay is a recognized liability head with its own structure.
9) Multimodal transport: when the route decides the law
Multimodal shipments (road + sea, road + air, rail + sea, etc.) create the classic question:
Which liability regime applies when damage location is unknown?
Turkish legal practice addresses multimodal carriage in the TCC with mode-sensitive logic: if an international convention governs a specific leg, it can override domestic general provisions for that leg. A commonly cited Turkish overview notes that multimodal carriage is specifically dealt with in TCC Articles 902–905.
Practical solution: draft for “unknown location” damage
If your cargo moves through multiple legs, your contract should include:
- Clear allocation of documentation duties per leg
- Handling/packaging standards
- Claims cooperation clauses (inspection, surveys, joint reports)
- Sub-carrier disclosure duties
- Insurance alignment (cargo insurance + liability insurance)
10) Dispute resolution in Turkey: what to plan for
Cargo disputes are typically handled through:
- Commercial courts (depending on the parties and contract structure)
- Interim measures where necessary (e.g., evidence preservation, security)
- Arbitration (especially in maritime and large logistics contracts)
Important: some conventions (e.g., CMR) contain jurisdiction frameworks that can limit “free choice” of forum. If you use boilerplate jurisdiction clauses, they may not work as expected in cross-border carriage.
11) Compliance and risk-reduction checklists
For shippers / exporters / importers
- Use written contracts (not just invoices + emails).
- Specify: packaging standards, temperature ranges, sealing procedure, loading responsibility.
- Put a document protocol in place: photos at loading, seals, weight tickets, CMR note accuracy checks.
- Require incident reporting within hours (not days).
- Align sales terms (Incoterms) with carriage contracts—Incoterms allocate commercial risk, not automatically carrier liability.
For carriers / logistics companies
- Clarify whether you act as carrier or forwarder/agent—and ensure documents match that role.
- Maintain vehicle suitability records, route logs, GPS, chain-of-custody data.
- Standardize damage reporting and survey workflows.
- Put limitation/time-bar alerts into your internal system.
- Ensure liability insurance terms match your operational reality (including theft hotspots and high-value cargo).
12) Common mistakes that turn a small incident into a major lawsuit
- Late or weak reservations at delivery (no written proof of condition).
- Wrong defendant (suing the organizer when the contractual carrier is different—or vice versa).
- Missing causation proof (especially for temperature deviation and delay).
- Ignoring SDR caps and declaration mechanics (recoverability collapses).
- Letting limitation periods run during “friendly negotiations.” (CMR time bars are famously short.)
13) How a lawyer helps in transportation-of-goods disputes
A focused transport lawyer typically supports clients by:
- Drafting/updating carriage and logistics contracts (role clarity, limitation strategy, claims cooperation clauses)
- Managing cargo claims from the first notice (evidence, surveys, reservation strategy)
- Litigating/arbitrating loss, damage, theft, delay disputes
- Handling cross-border issues: convention analysis (CMR/Montreal/sea regimes), jurisdiction challenges
- Structuring recourse claims against sub-carriers and insurers
FAQ: Transportation of Goods Law in Turkey
Which law applies if I ship by road from Turkey to Europe?
Usually the CMR Convention applies to international road carriage, including its 1-year limitation period (3 years for wilful misconduct scenarios).
What is the typical carrier liability limit in Turkish road carriage disputes?
A commonly applied cap is 8.33 SDR per kilogram in standard loss/damage scenarios under the Turkish road carriage framework.
Does Turkey apply the Montreal Convention for air cargo?
Yes—Turkey appears in International Civil Aviation Organization materials as having ratified the Montreal Convention, which is highly relevant for air cargo disputes.
How do multimodal shipments get treated?
Turkish practice recognizes multimodal carriage rules in the TCC, and conventions can override domestic provisions for specific legs. Turkish-focused summaries commonly cite TCC Articles 902–905 for multimodal carriage.
Yanıt yok